>VP of engineering and managers and CEOs and everyone urges the rest of us software engineers and other to fill out the "anonymous" engagement survey to "help us improve"should I do it?they are lying that its anonymous arent they?
>>107530687Only do it if the whole team has shit to complain about, otherwise do not. Unless you're in a real big department, outliers can be traced back to the employee that has a problem a good 75% of the time. Either software tells them or just a conversation between mid-level and senior-level leadership narrows it down.Applicable to fast food joints, corpo office jobs, govt/intel agencies, and much more.
>>107530687>"anonymous"neutral answers in every field
>>107530687>they are lying that its anonymous arent they?So far I had to send an anonymous survey last november, didn't fill it and no one told me anything, either they're saving face or it is actually anonymous, but I swear to God, I don't trust a single bit Microsoft forms to be anonymous.
>anonymous surveyslmao
>>107530888so fake
>>107530687They're not anonymous. Personally, I fill them out, because it looks better for your team/group/division to have a higher response rate, but I put 5/5 for everything, and skip any 'write something' answers, since your word phrasing can give you away. If they force you to write something I just write something incredibly generic like "More innovation".
>>107530687>they are lying that its anonymous arent they?I think so, yes. I was too candid on one of those (after they complained of few opinions sent) and months later I was laid off.Even if they anonymize it strictly speaking they can still tell who it was due to typing style, kind of complaint, etc.You'd have to be extremely generic in your comments while filtering it through GPT and even then you'd have to trust the platform (shit like Qualtrics promises anonymization but good luck proving they haven't honored it)
