what if they made a 2.0 version removing duplicated features and bloat?
>>107536321what if hardware keeps advancing at this rate and C++ becomes useless in most of the areas it's used in by 2040?
>>107536321>what if they released C++ but goodthats just C retard
>>107536321The issue is that backwards compatibility is what keeps C++ alive. It's also what started it. Remember when C++ evangelists would tell people to "upgrade" their C source code to C++?
you'd end up with C
What would a perfect C++ look like though?
>>107536321It would be immediately co-opted by trannies.
>>107536321starting with c++26 (static reflection) they should deprecate the entire STL and start a new standard library
>>107537130
>>107537130I NEED IN C:1. REMOVE RULE OF PRE DEFINATION, I LIKE TO DEFFINE DATATYPES LAST2. AUTO CREATION *.h FILES FOR EVERY *.obj AND *.lib3. NAMESPASES (JUST FOR FUN)ALSO MULTIPLE VARIABLES RETURN FROM "GO" CAN BE NICEI GET: C++
>>107536321That's D
>>107538099>*.obj and *.lib
>>107536321They did. It's called Rust.>>107536403>>107536702C is the 0.0 version.
