I'm not a programmer, but I have a PhD in linguistics. I am literally a cunning linguist, and literally all of you are fucking retarded because you don't conjugate your verbs right.It's not>dog.walk()It's >theDog.walks()Also, they're not "objects", they're noun phrases, and they're not "functions", they're verb phrases.I hate non-English code so much that I'm working on a transpiler that turns python into my own conlang. That's right, faggots, I don't think python is readable enough
>>107537930>I hate non-English code so much that I'm working on a transpiler that turns python into my own conlang.Why don't you use VB.NET or Ruby.
>>107537930I can rape good grammar if I want
>>107538065i already figured out how to turn english into ruby when i was manic. it's inspired by GEB and IAASL
>>107537930>paganism
>not a minimalistChomsky would be disappointed, anon
>>107537930See, trouble is your memelang with 0.0000000000000001 coverage of python is practically possible to design in a consistent and beautiful way, will it be of any use to anyone though? no-one except you, and only as pasttime recreation
>>107537930God Luke, you are such a retard. No wonder you never got any further than your vimrc.I didnt study linguistics but i dont think there are "inidicative" programming languages. I guess haskell and maybe something like satlib might come close to your "indicative" form.As for the imperative paradigm, object oriented languages could be considered imperative. Even though you have Objects, you describe a procedure that should be executed on a machine and not a constraint that should be inferred. Walking down a tree of objects doesnt magically make your langauges "indicative".You are just a retarded conman who doesnt understand that programming languages are not some magic sub-symbolic ai nlp prompt, they are defined by strict rules which is why we can design algorithms in them.You wanna make something chatgpt and c, knock yourself out. Don't make a fool of yourself with such strong statements you make.
during my first manic episode i wrote a function that i called the NCCSI function (noam chomsky can suck it function)turns out i was having visions of a steganography algorithm that i wouldn't know how to write until like july 2025
>>107538270i've already written the transpiler. I have a conlang that is mapped from python, do you have one of those?
>>107538270Also, if you like languages in indicative form, why dont you use HDLs like verilog, chisel or vhdl. Plus points if you use them without "oh the" imperative statements for debugging and sequential blocks that describe state transitions instead of the actual state.
>>107538270>never got past vimrcstop humiliating yourself, my .zsh_history is 20,000 lines and i didn't really get into it until october
>>107538352the transpiler is already written i am certainly not taking any garbage advice from you. fuck off. do back to your DSA homework you fucking rookie
>I'm not a programmerEvidently. May I recommend understanding the concept you're talking about before trying to assert corrections about it.
>>107538332No idea what a conlang is. I've written my own assembler and designed my own processor, retard.
that's cause it's math not linguistics retard
>>107538370I've been serious about coding for 8 years. First learned about it 20 years ago. Don't you have a test to be studying for right now?
>>107539107Self proclaimed linguistic mastermind and genius polymath and yet the only retort he can muster is reusing a single pathetic attempt at ad hominem. Sad. Though I suppose I am impressed you've managed to successfully wordsmith yourself into a situation of pure irony at breakneck speed.
