GPT 5.2 scores 72% on GPDval which is an exhaustive test of how well AI handles complex tasks from 3200 different information jobs like typical office work. This is a threshold good enough for AI to begin replacing white collar workers.
>>107539395>white collar workersSo, no more 6fig daycare? Oh well, back to the mines I guess.
>>107539395>good enoughYou don't have a job. It will be good enough in a couple of years tho so you are not entirely wrong>>107539427>NOOO DONT TALK ABOUT TECHNOLOGY IN DA TECH BOARDYou need to go back
>>107539395RIKADASHI nkdshi!
>>107539395>GPT 5.2 scores 72% on a test designed by OpenAI themselvesIt's a literal nothingburger.
>>107539395God imagine trying to corral people that could only do 72% of the tasks that an office drone could doYou'd lose your mind
>>10753976572% of absolutely nothing is still absolutely nothing.
>>107539765You have a lot of assumptions in your post. And your biggest one is that you think the average office worker would score 100%
>>107539395Great.Does that mean they can stop importing so many fucking jeets now?
>>107539395Then who's gonna take responsibility for the remaining 30% of the times when it fucks up?
>>107539846Lol it's jeets who code these AI apps bro, if anything they'll import more of them to maintain the apps
Been saying since 2023: if this thing really starts to threaten white collar workers, white collar workers will simply decline to implement it en masse, quietly. We're basically seeing that happen now (95% of implementations fail). Nothingburger.
>>107539868>white collar workersThe same people who needed ->one-way-> stickers on the floor to avoid the flu? They'll do what they're told all the time and forever.
>>107539883And yet, here we are several years later, no closer to replacing jobs in any meaningful volume.
>>107539883True enough.
>>107539395I've been saying the first jobs that'll go will be the information based roles, I've been saying this since before modern AI and I got laughed at hard because at the time people thought delivery would be the first jobs to be automated and I work in the transportation and logistics sector and I tell everyone that transport and logistics is so incredibly complex it'll be one of the later jobs to be taken by AI. Now I'm having the last laugh but it's bittersweet
>>107539395rika!!!! *smooch* *smooch* *smooch* uoooohhhhh
>>107539953Hasn't unemployment been getting more prevalent in recent years?
>>107540121Due to AI or due to importing a bunch of poopskins combined with high interest rates?
>>107539953That's only because chatbots are fucking retarded and probably always will be.If they weren't, people would be replaced, and as they were being replaced, they would celebrate it on linkedin like it was a major cultural victory because they were told to.
>>107540133Not even joking it's hard to draw a distinction anymore in my perspective.As in like, the machines are at least as good as the human floor, or you could interpret it the other way, the floor is using AI to compensate for their own limits.I'm not sure if it's meaningful to draw a line between them, maybe, but right now it's kind of nebulous to me.
>>107540159There is no hard evidence right now that AI has put any kind of meaningful dent in employment (a CEO saying it is not hard evidence, when the incentive to lie about layoffs to prevent stock cratering is that high)
>>107539395omg who the hell cares?!
