Which one?
16:10 is the golden ratio. literally perfection.
>>107541410Wide aspect ratios are better for tvs and desktop monitors, but laptops in squarer form factors are comfier. Widescreen laptops feel clunky and have a bunch of unnecessary space around the keyboard.
>>107541410I ONLY POST FROM MY APPLE WATCH AND THE LOWERCASELOCK BUTTON ON MY APPLE WATCH IS BROKEN> - SENT FROM MY APPLE WATCH
>>1075414105:4. Once I started using 5:4 laptops, I never went back.
>>1075414105:4bc you can see the most code weighed against page width5:4 is just perfect
>>107541410>>107541426>think 16:10 or 16:9 have slim border>reality: wasted space
>>107541410The squarer, the better.
>>107541410There's also 3:2.
>>107541646It's just Lenovo constantly fucking up and not knowing how to do proper display lids
1:1 laptop
3:2
>>107541410I don't care so long as the keyboard layout doesn't suck ass
>>107541714this, it should be 1:1
>>10754141016:10 just looks right. It drew my eye.
The one laptop I ever really wanted but never managed to get was a PowerBook G4 12''Something about its dimensions just always looked right.
whatever apple does. mac <3
>>107541788>>107541744>>107541714human field of view is neither square nor circular but elliptic with a larger horizontal fov than vertical because with have two eyes at the same height."For both eyes, combined (binocular vision) visual field is approximately 100° vertical and a maximum 190° horizontal, approximately 120° of which makes up the binocular field of view (seen by both eyes) flanked by two uniocular fields (seen by only one eye) of approximately 40 degrees."
>>107541410I want 7:5 but have to cope with 3:2
>>10754141016:10 and then 5:4. Everything else is ass tier.
>>10754141016:9 because I don't like black bars when watching videos
>>107541410for a laptop 16:10 or 3:2
16:9 because it's predictable and accessible.
>>107541410They are in perfect order from best to worse from left to right.Laptops (and tablets) with a screen wider than 4:3 is a total nonsense.
How the fuck can some anons prefer 16:10 and even 16:9!? Are you extraterrestrials?Or maybe you are just young and never used anything else...
>>107542187>>10754223716:9 on a laptop is retarded, the palmrest is not deep enough, forcing you to rest your hand on the sharp edge
>>107541410I miss 5:4 desu
>>107541426fpbp
>>107542265everything else than 16:9 is retarded, forcing you to watch stupid black bars
>>107542255They're herbivores.
>>107542345Laptops are for WORK, so taller is better. If I want to watch a movie, I don't accept such inferior experience, I'll use my bigass TV.
>>107541410I find it much more sensible to compare ratios with common denominators >1350:1080>1440:1080>1728:1080>1920:1080
>>107541410Having that empty space to the left and right of the keyboard looks embarrassingly retarded, so I'd go with 5:4 or 4:3.
>>107542265I've never had this issue.
>>107542396It's nice if they throw in some beefy speakers but most of these laptops do those fucking down-firing speakers
>>1075414104:3it's the golden ratioliterally absolute perfection
>>107542368>Laptops are for WORKnah
rollable screens will change the game
>>107541714Based and perfectpilled1:1 best
