Aside from being a new browser, will this shit bring something new to the web? Because 99% of people don't use a browser based on the browser engine itself. Even people who are geeky enough to change browsers don't use a browser based on its engine itself (the only reason why I use Firefox is because of userchrome.css and customization; if I could do that on Chromium, I would dump FF in a blink of an eye).So my point is: other than "hey, we are a new browser engine" what will this bring to the table?
If there is a gaming browser, what can't there be a drug user browser?
>>107543087he look more like cakes and pies user in latest videos than a drug user desu
>>107543056Idk much about it but the goal of any browser should be to be faster, less sluggish and consume less memory than the competitor, while innovating in UX for efficiency (things like vertical tabs), and including safe defaults (no fingerprinting, adblock, etc).
>>107543056>what does this even bring to the table >yes i know what it brings to the table, but no that doesn't count because i don't care about it personally>so other than what it brings to the table, what will this bring to the table?alright buddy....
>>107543056The point was to keep him away from drugs.
>>107543254Serenity was to keep busy while detoxing. Ladybird is just Andreas returning to Appleslop habits.
>>107543172Okay, got it. It doesn't bring anything to the table.
Right now, web browsers add things based on what a committee of three browser engines can agree on. It used to be four before ms dropped trident. So the radical and world changing proposal of ladybird is to make it... four browsers again. Also, even if he refused to implement a bunch of shit, all the other engines would just move on without him and he would be left behind. I also doubt that he would be any more of an advocate for users than mozilla is presently, just a hunch.I've occasionally thought about what web dev would look like if we didn't have the retardation that is css and js. What I wish someone would do would be make a nonretarded web browser. Devs would prefer it because it makes web dev easier. You would add a way for them to port their site to the normal web, so they wouldn't even lose users. Users would prefer it because it would have better performance, not be anti user, and have more features. I don't think this would even necessarily be that hard, you would just need a couple million in investment/donation...
The main benefit you get as a normal person is that they're finding a shit ton of bugs in the web specs and other browsers that are getting fixed.>if I could do that on Chromium, I would dump FF in a blink of an eyeThen you admit you do care about the engine. Gecko fucking sucks and Blink is cool and fast.>>107543170>innovating in UX for efficiency (things like vertical tabs)lol, lmao>safe defaults (no fingerprintingkekkkkk
>>107543452no, it means he cares about customization. someone really needs to fork vivaldi to allow user theming based on html/css/js.>>107543170all browsers use the same resources nowadays because they all work off the same principles. you need multiprocessing and insanely retarded ipc. 64 bit pointers despite the aforementioned process splitting.
>>107543087he has a gay junkie face and i want to tear it off
>>107543056>don't use a browser based on its engine itselfw-what? always have, always will
>>107543452>>107543563He's a form over function fag. Plenty of those.
>>107544251there is no difference in function
>>107543056It brings a new iToddler browser to the market.Ladybird's main competition is Safari, not Chrome.
>>107544355>there is no difference in functionWhy would you do that? Just come on the internet and lie?
>>107544375>Will Ladybird work on Windows?>We don't have anyone actively working on Windows support, and there are considerable changes required to make it work well outside a Unix-like environment.>We would like to do Windows eventually, but it's not a priority at the moment.Welp, I'll check it out when they get there, or if I install Linux.
I'm sad he abandoned SerenityOS to focus on HTML compliance bullshit. It was so comfy watching him show off the new OS features and tweaking the code
>>107543411Does the WWW even still exist?I though most of the internet is now on (((apps)))
>>107544435there is literally no functional difference in well, function. save for web compat errors, in which case servo loses on all fronts.
>>107543563>someone really needs to fork vivaldi to allow user theming based on html/css/js.You mean you want to be able to customise the browser chrome? That's a very basic and bland part of the browser, how much can you even customise in that. Most browsers have some basic themes anyway.And if you want a custom starting page, you can build that and use it with Chromium.I doubt it's possible to customise the browser's chrome areas (tabs, address bar etc) with CSS/JS. Those are part of the OS API that creates windows.
>>107543056https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0kbkysPTnHcSocial media has primed an environment where this type of degeneracy is not only accepted, it thrives. Social media desensitizes and radicalizes even moderates into believing heinous and abhorrent behavior is acceptable under the correct context. Spend just 5 minutes on Twitter, Facebook, Reddit, you will find hordes of these deranged people. They exist among us. The FBI knows about them but never acts until it is far too late. Western society is on a one-way fast track to collapse as long as social media continues to destroy minds and decay the culture.
