systemd makes linux pointless. you get more of a headache (complexity) + you get spied on when you use linux, instead of just getting spied on with windowsopen source is like having open borders too, its a feminine and communistic philosophylinux requires internet to be usable, its baked in to the OS design to be dependant on packages and dependencies where it has to constantly make a connection and reach out to do something, and to use it requires constant googling and a.i usage, more internetit also wastes tons of time, and trannies are always changing the software. at least with windows your .exe will always work across windows versions for the most part, and windows can be set up fully offlinewindows 11 is still MILES better than linux. the only thing that makes linux good is virtualization, and they are going to crack down on that soon, i can just feel it. there are so many moving parts to windows virtualization via qemu and fedora drivers
>>107548250Everything you just wrote is wrong and you should kill yourself.
>>107548283oh and microsoft jeet drones have taken over the open source community too. all the windows jeets use command line now. linux is pozzed anyway (and there's the tranny issue)
>>107548250if you don't like systemD you can get some distro like artix.my old exes work better on linux with wine than on windows.windows 11 requires an internet connection too, and an email.Linux works on pretty much any pc, my install doesn't use more than 1gb ram and 20gb, and it's still considered bloated by some, while windows 11 won't even boot if you don't have at least 8ram and 250gb plus the chip to make their surveillance AI work. Also windows 11 updates break the system constantly too, and make it worse, and unlike linux, you can't rollback or go to some slower stable version.what motivates someone to write a post like this? do you think OP just genuinely believes windows is better? or there might be something else going on here?
>>107548755Winholes BTFO
>>107548755It's systemd
>>107548250>open source is like having open borders too, its a feminine and communistic philosophyJesus and the early Christians were communistsCommunism isn't an inherently bad philosophy
>>107548250>open source is like having open borders too, its a feminine and communistic philosophyHow?Having end control of your software is the only way to have freedom. It is as masculine and independent as one can get. Sharing isn't a feminine concept. You're just retarded.Closed source is akin to choosing to have a master, unless you get it solely to reverse engineer it. Additionally, if you aren't the master of your software, with current data harvesting and enshittification then your software is the master of you, and this goes beyond being beholden to a corporation to allow you to use a 'license.' It is literally the most cucked and feminine philosophy you can live by: dependence on daddy software company for allowance, and/or revokation and loss of rights through a TOS.
>>107549073all of this^OP is just a copping faggot
>>107548250who spies on you tho?
>>107548250Nobody cares about your bugmen opinion. You roll over and let a jeet shove his shit crusted dick inside of you while I punch that faggot in his face. We are not the same
Might as well just use Windows.
>>107548250>systemd makes linux pointlessdont use it>open source is like having open borders too???>linux requires internet to be usableinternet is only required if you want to install new programs and updates, same as Windows, Mac, iOS, Android...>to use it requires constant googling and a.i usageif e.g you install mint for normal use, you will need no more googling than windows. if you want to do something weird then you might have to google, same deal on Windows et al.>it also wastes tons of timeoptional>trannies are always changing the softwaredebian stable, no changes for 2y>at least with windows your .exe will always work across windows versionsnot my experience>windows 11 is still MILES better than linuxif you like taking brown cock
>>107548857>Jesus was a communistyeah i remember how Jesus declared that there was no God because religion is the opium of the massesand when he said the kingdom of heaven sucks because kings are badand when he said everybody should only care about what the romans want and become obedient chattel because the almighty state would take care of themthen the romans crucified the guy who was saying exactly what they wanted him to because... they just did OK??retard
>>107548250>you get spied on when you use linuxEvidence?>open source is like having open borders too, its a feminine and communistic philosophyGo back to /pol. Retard. You use 'communistic' shit every day, and you're too fucking simple to notice. Evil communistic things like roads.Fucking retard.>Linux requires internet to be usableDemonstrably false.>its baked in to the OS design to be dependant on packages and dependencies where it has to constantly make a connection and reach out to do somethingThis is different to other OS's, how? Point at the OS that isn't dependant on a complex mess of other chunks. The difference with *nix is you get to choose the chunks. That is all.Nothing makes connections that isn't a piece of core functionality. As a rule. I encourage contradicting examples.>and to use it requires constant googling and a.i usage, more internetNo. That's just you.>it also wastes tons of time,Also you.>and trannies are always changing the softwareGo back to /pol. You stupid cunt.Not everything you can't understand is a transvestite.>at least with windows your .exe will always work across windows versions for the most partDemonstrably false.>windows can be set up fully offlineCan it, tho? The shit you argue about 'having' to download for *nix, to make that winhoes functionally usable, *can* you not go online?>windows 11 is still MILES better than linuxAs demonstrated by the constant bitching by people that have to use win11, about win11...>the only thing that makes linux good is virtualization,That. And the battle proven reliability of decades of uptime.>and they are going to crack down on that soonORLY?How?>many moving parts to windows virtualization via qemu and fedora driversYou realise them isn't linux, right?
>>107550160>and when he said everybody should only care about what the romans wantYou can ofc cite evidence of this?
>>107550210no, because he never said that, because he wasnt a commie
>>107550222He kinda was a communist.You recall that famous scene where he gave everyone free lunch?What you call that? Capitalism?tw@.Fuck off back to /pol with the rest of the dribbling mongaloids crying about their country imploding because they're that fucking stupid jeets are an upgrade.
>>107548283>Ooooh im just edgy teen boi on ze internet look at me moom i can write KYS to somebody.Im afraid that i will have to share this bad news with you. You are nigger.
>>107550363>You are nigger.No. That's you.This isn't a slight at skin tone. I use it in the true and full sense of the word. You are very much a nigger. So much, you don't even deserve a capital N.NTA, btw. Just an observation based on the evidence you're desperate to provision.
>>107550395I didn't say anything about your skin. You are mentally Nigger. It's incurable.
>>107550415I was just making very abundantly clear what I meant, when I called you nigger.You are indeed incurable. Your inability to stick on topic is frequent.Whenever your internal retardation is demonstrated to be false - which is also frequent - you instantly devolve into shouting 'nigger', 'tranny', 'brown', 'thirdie' or whatever nonsensical bullshit makes your butthurt less sore. Despite the obvious outcome, when challenged with this information, all you can do about it is double down on the previous failure of gobbing shit in an impotent attempt to try and quell the butthurt.
>>107550240If communists are able to conjure free lunch out of thin air then why did so many people starve to death in Russia, China et al?Communism has nothing to do with sharing, it's about subordination of individual will under the state.Sharing, whether it's sharing food or sharing code, is antithetical to that because it doesn't involve the state at all. The whole point of the Christian message is that its your individual responsibility to make the world a better place.That's why it's moronic to call open-source software communist; there's no "people's republic of linux" doing central planning on what software can be written and what languages are allowed to be used. People make and share stuff out of the kindness of their heart, not because they were forced to.
>>107550851>If communists are able to conjure free lunch out of thin airSo, you believe this to be a function of communism, and not the supposed miracle?>Communism has nothing to do with sharingCommunity is right there in the fucking word. It's all about sharing. The only reason the 'state' requires involvement is to ensure 'fairness' and here is where it typically falls apart because the 'state' are composed of people, who are inherently flawed in nature.>The whole point of the Christian message is that its your individual responsibility to make the world a better place.Why has religion suddenly become a tangible factor in a thread about *nix?It's also the christian message to give to those with less than you, which sounds remarkably communistic to me.>That's why it's moronic to call open-source software communistYeah. The fact it's built by a community isn't something that matters.>there's no "people's republic of linux"You mean, like the linux foundation?>planning on what software can be written and what languages are allowed to be used. You can provision evidence, ofc, of all the other operating systems that prevent your choice of language, or what software xenotypes are allowed to exist?>People make and share stuff out of the kindness of their heart, not because they were forced toHmm. Sounds communistic to me. Provision conflicting evidence.
>>107550996>So, you believe this to be a function of communism, and not the supposed miracle?No, I'm saying that Jesus was able to feed the 5000 because he is God, not because he's a communist. You seem to think that providing free lunch is something that communists do, but since they aren't God, the can't conjure food out of thin air in order to provide said lunch. I suppose they could grow food themselves and then give it away to others but I've never heard of a communist doing this.>Community is right there in the fucking word. It's all about sharingThe "commune" bit is a nod to the communist's belief that the human individual doesn't exist, but is actually just a member of a "commune" or a social group (e.g. the working class). As opposed to the Christian view that we are strictly individuals.>It's all about sharingThe "sharing" that communists are interested in consists of enslaving those they disapprove of and seizing what they produce to distribute to those they approve of. As opposed to voluntarily giving away your own property, which is what people usually mean when they say sharing.>The only reason the 'state' requires involvementis to enslave those people because you wouldn't be able to do it on your own>it typically falls apart because the 'state' are composed of people, who are inherently flawed in natureWe can agree on this at least, although that's not the only nor the decisive reason why state intervention fails to improve the world>Why has religion suddenly become a tangible factor in a thread about *nix?You'll have to ask >>107548857>linux foundationThe linux foundation doesn't regulate what OSS is available. They don't even regulate what's in the linux kernel, since that's done by the kernel maintainers. Anyway if you want to roll your own kernel builds/patches and share them you are free to, as well as to use whatever libraries/coreutils/compilers/etc you like, and make and share as you like. Not centrally planned.
>>107548250I downloaded whole distfiles repo from gentoo and i use it locally for my own distro because gentoo is overcomplicated, i have total freedom to do anything and i need no internet and if i want something extra i can just archive it. You probably tried out arch and came to this conclusion, for which you would be right.
>>107551185You are really determined to insert politics and religion everywhere it has no valid place, huh?Well, allow me to refute your stupidity so you may know that which you hold true to your core is wrong. Because you are wrong. It's built in at a genetic level.>Jesus was able to feed the 5000 because he is God, not because he's a communist.But because he is a communist, he just did it. He didn't give them a bill afterwards.>You seem to think that providing free lunch is something that communists doGiving something with no expectation of a return is very communistic.>As opposed to the Christian view that we are strictly individuals.Until assembled in a group.At which point charity is preached, a communistic concept.>consists of enslaving those they disapprove of and seizing what they produce to distribute to those they approve ofThis is a function of corruption, not communism. Please demonstrate conflicting evidence. Or concede you are indeed an inbred impotent mongaloid, and fuck off back to /pol.>is to enslave those peopleDemonstrate how this is not the case where you live.Or let me guess. You *want* to pay taxes? You *want* to obey the laws that interfere with your fucked up beliefs?>You'll have to ask Or, I can direct the question to the retard who insists on dragging it up.>The linux foundation doesn't regulate what OSS is availableAnd why would it? Open source isn't a function of linux, and actually traces it's roots to the shareware movement - another communistic concept.If you wasn't so desperate to turn this into a political debate, you'd realise the fallicy in your arguments before you hit enter.But you don't. Because you belong in /pol with the other retards so you flailing invalids are easier to ignore. We don't have to look at it.
