now inb4>os don't have souls you retard!!!!!!!!!!!111111Yes, they do and if you were spiritually attuned you could feel itI'll start>FreeBSD
>>107552252AROS
>>107552252>troonBSD>betatesting this shit for sony, apple and netflix who barely contribute backyeah, no.
>>107552443I like FreeBSD jails though
>>107552252>>os don't have souls you retard!!!!!!!!!!!111111kek you had to wrote that because of me. you win this time...
Haiku
>>107552471How do Jails differ from Docker containers?
>inb4 cuck license
Anyone tried or have an opinion on GhostBSD?
>>107553012Tried it, it's just FreeBSD for babies.
>>107552252Windows XPDebian before 12GentooNetBSDFreeBSD does not have soul
>>107552252>Yes, they doOkay then, you'll be able to prove this with empirical and impircal evidence.Bonus points if you achieve it without references to your religious ideologies.>>107553040>Windows XP/me shakes head sadly.
>>107552252AtheOShttps://atheos.metaproject.frl/
>>107552252>>107553012>>107553040cuck license
Allow me to name some:GentooDebianArch (to an extent)VoidUbuntu (until 2016)Windows 2000 & XPMac OS 8 & 9Mac OS X (pre intel)NeXTSTEPIRIXSolaris (under Sun)Pretty much all of the BSDsBasically, mostly POSIX-compliant oses with a nice coat of paint.
there is only one
>>107552252slackware
>>107553350>Basically, mostly POSIX-compliant oses with a nice coat of paint.POSIX is the definition of soulless.>imitating Unix brain damage to check a box because Unix trannies tricked the government into favoring Unix over non-Unix systems
>>107553320you're late fag>>107552759do better, thats what mossad pays you for
my OS has soul because I put soul into it. Developing 140+ GIMP plugins on a fucking fedora workstation.
>>107553873You can only post what you use exclusively without succumbing to the botnet.
What's the point of FreeBSD when Linux exists?
>>107556989jailszfsno rustidk what else.
>>107556989glibc sucks
>>107557005You can use bsd libc with loonix.
>>107557003>jailsi have never had a reason to use anything beyond a chroot but good point i guess>zfsI'm guessing this is a filesystem, how is it an improvement over ext4?>no rustHahhahah, good point! But nitpicking, unless all of Linux is being converted to Rust (I heard Ubuntu has some problems like this... sure glad I don't use Ubuntu though)>glibc sucksYou take that back right now. glibc is immaculate. I used GNU tools even when I was still using Wangblow$. gcc is extremely powerful wizardry.
>>107557063this is whyhttps://youtu.be/Pzl1B7nB9Kc?si=B6Vbh2OuxtiCFpoBglibc breaks compatibility all the time, and honestly makes it hell if you wanna distribute your software in linux
>>107557063>zfs>I'm guessing this is a filesystem, how is it an improvement over ext4?There's so much to it it's not even funny and I'm getting tired of just thinking of listing it all. Read up or watch a video or something. ZFS exists on Linux, but lacks first class support due to licencing issues, which makes usign it a bit of a hack. Btrfs is the current next-best-thing, it's native to Linux and most of its features have been inspired by ZFS, so you'll probably want to use that instead.
>>107552252Windows 7
>>107557211XP had more soul but I still prefer 7
>>107557203> but you can recompile just distribute your codeend users just wanna click a button and install
>>107557209Both Linux and FreeBSD use the same OpenZFS implementation. The only difference is that FreeBSD can use it as a full boot environment by default.
>>107557256I know. But there's a difference between "implementation" in terms of how zfs manages storage and "implementation" as an integral component of the entire operating system. I'm using root-on-ZFS-on-Linux right now and have had to deal with kernel modules not loading, shoddy bootloader ZFS support, disappearing boot entries, initramfs failing to find/include relevant modules, etc etc. The kind of stuff that I don't see happening on FreeBSD or Solaris/illumos, since ZFS gets native treatment there.
>>107557203this is literally solved by package managerssuch a non issue, distributing binaries is a worse way of doing things anyway. And if you do want to distribute binaries just compile static with musl, the linux ABI is stable
>>107557029Literally no one does that from what I know. It's **technically** possible. Just like it's possible to use musl on BSD. But feasible? That's another question.
>>107558576Android does it.
>>107552419/thread
>>107552252I don't want to run an OS that tips hat to the devil.
>>107552252pufferfish wit da big ass lip
>>107552706only one mention of haiku? not a single one of beos?if there is a soul desktop is that one
contrarian OS
>>107556989Linux has reinventing-the-wheel syndrome, and it's becoming progressively more trooned and cucked. The sudden flash abandonment of X11 purely because of the XLibre chud shows just how culturally charged the whole Linux space is now. FreeBSD, and moreso OpenBSD, remains truer to SG/Boomer/GenX hacker culture and values of correctness and Doing One Thing Well.Enjoy your breakage over in Linux loony land.
>>107552443>sony, apple and netflix who barely contribute backthis affects you how?
>>107552252Can't get the vm to work and ethernet is basically required.
>>107560519Enjoy no hardware support.
>>107560519>The sudden flash abandonment of X11Opinion discarded. Take your meds.
>>107560519>Linux has reinventing-the-wheel syndrome, and it's becoming progressively more trooned and cucked.Unix systems have always been like that.>remains truer to SG/Boomer/GenX hacker culture and values of correctness and Doing One Thing Well.Unix trannies were always against correctness and the only thing Unix programs did well was have bugs that made them crash and get hacked. Unix trannies were the people who killed the old programming culture.
>>107557349Which are an issue when one of the apps the end user wants to use depends on a lower ver of glibc and another depends on a higher ver of glibc because of subtle behaviorThe BSD/darwin approach of making it ABI unstable/API stable is better imho
>>107560530exactly. this doesn't affect anyone. in fact, it's the single thing that singlehandedly enshittified loonix over the years. have fun with trillion loc kernel and basedstemd that has more loc than the entire openbsd project. i myself will onyl use linux under a xen hypervisor from now on
>>107557345That's likely a distro thing. I've been running openZFS for about a year in this gentoo desktop and I've never had any problems at all.
>>107560676That's why I said compile static with musl.And I don't see how a stable kernel ABI would be responsible for any problems with library versions anyway.
>>107561317are you running it as a kernel module? then you will encounter problems. can you compile it on gentoo inside the kernel itself? i thought that wasnt possible due to licensing
>>107561317root on ZFS? if so, what bootloader?>>107562142you can compile it in if you want, you just can't legally distribute the compiled version. not that it would achieve anything, the problem isn't that it's a module, the problem is that it being legally incompatible with the kernel makes it somewhat of an afterthought in the Linux universe.
