>>107554605
Capitalism is dead and we live under techno feudalism. The winners of capitalism fled with their wealth to the Arab nations or gated communities. The masses do not have enough money to be worth selling to so expect more shit like ram companies pulling out of consumer markets to focus on serving the rich. Why invest money into places where people have no money, have no hope of ever having money?

File: 1758376949969460.jpg (1.22 MB, 3024x3024)

1.22 MB JPG

>>107554605
Here's your tech aesthetic, sir

>>107554671
Let's say you are on a deserted island. You have 100 people. How do you decide who does what? Who should gather wood, who should look for food, and who should look for water, etc? With just 100 people you might get by fine by just telling them what to do, but what if there are 1000 people? 10k? 100k? Millions? Billions?

Capitalism is the decentralization of this decision making process. In other words, every dollar is a vote which you can use to decide where the total productive capacity of our civilization can go.

This itself causes many problems, but these are not what I want to bring up. The primary issue is that people will use their votes to acquire more votes. And, the more votes you have, the easier it is to acquire more. The natural end state of capitalism is a small group of people controlling all of global production. They want yachts, you make yachts. They want ram, you get none.

This is the intended goal. You will own nothing.

>>107554671
grim