>implying your government dont already know everything you do on your phone.
kek how naive are you?

only the saddest of coomers jerk off to their phones.
these perverts need to be catalogued and monitored permanently. they are literally rapists waiting to happen

>>107579049
kek
>takes picture of self nude
>picture gets sent to 27 AI companies for validation
This time line is impossibly retarded.

>>107579049
The UK will try anything other than arresting the paki rape gangs to stop violence against women huh

>>107579609
Stop making the rapevaders horny, and the sexual emergencies might decline. Just wear the burka and never go in public without a male escort.
It's really no that hard. You should accommodate minorities in your country even if they are the majority.
Just stop trying to oppress people

>>107579049
>It is an attempt to curb the rising violence against women and girls according to the home office
Women and girls? Pfff, who cares. Children? OH MY GOD, YES GOVERNMENT!!! Please PLEASE think of the children, just give us all the censorships and digital IDs and everything to protect the kids. PLEASE, I beg of thee, just grant all the powers in the law books to control this evil evil island.

>>107579049
cucked country
orwell dystopian

>>107579781
I smell a sweating pedo feeling the noose

sorry /g/ you can no longer send dick pics to your neice

Save your old devices.

File: file.png (2.15 MB, 960x1622)

2.15 MB PNG

Avert your eyes, anglicucks, this will stop Javeed from raping 12 year olds, maybe.

we all already have a digital ID, you just dont know about it.
Snowden told you this 15 years ago for fucks sake, dumb zoomies.
they know everything you've ever done on your phone, PC whatever.

>>107579049
install graphene os

>>107579049
>>107579049
ignore the rape gangs though

>>107579049
>blah blah blah sexism blah blah blah
Every tme. I mean the UK, not op.

>>107579915
Ah, yes, of course. Only, there's a slight niggling problem, isn't there? Namely, that this dragnet surveillance is illegal in most countries (yes, even the USA, that darned 4th amendment is actually real). But how do we get around this, might you ask? Oh, of course! Get the golems to identify themselves WILLINGLY, and then we have easy parallel construction. Oh no, mister judge sir, we NEVER would use that juicy data the NSA and FBI obtained illegally, no sir. See, we followed his online activity through his digital ID, which he willingly gave up and used entirely of his own accord, pay no mind to coercive tactics.
Of course, there's the simple matter that you're entirely glossing over, which is that if this was all utterly useless there would be no point to it. They could use the dragnet surveillance data to identify each and every under-16 on the net and use their backdoors to deploy a rootkit that does whatever the fuck censorship they want. No identification needed, no proles in furor over having to provide ID to watch porn! Simple problems, simple solutions. But that would also be ILLEGAL, from start to finish. So, they need this digital ID to actually make use of their dragnet surveillance without incriminating themselves.
If the previous tracking collar worked fine, why all the fuss over upgrading it to a shiny new state-of-the-art one? Could it be that it removes ambiguity in their dragnet surveillance and provides more accurate, granular data? Could it be that it allows them to perform illegal surveillance with a pretext of legality for parallel construction in court? Hmm, yes, that seems like it.
Don't bother replying; I'm only writing this to provide a counter-narrative to your damage control, for the lurkers to read. In fact, I'm in nearly every thread about digital ID, spreading truth amongst institutional lies. If you're not a shill, and just a forlorn anon, then I hope you'll understand why this is necessary.