[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/g/ - Technology


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 1746958618491128.png (302 KB, 1280x719)
302 KB
302 KB PNG
Do you have bufferbloat?
>>
>>107589299
i am smarter than any AI slop smart queue management (SQM) sytem
>>
No.
Also, this thing introduces additional latency overhead proportional to traffic so unless you got idiots downloading shit via BitTorrent, leave it.
>>
>>107589327
What does AI have to do with SQM?
>>
>>107589331
>thing introduces additional latency overhead proportional to traffic
Proof? Unless you actually mean the factions of ms processing takes.
>>
>>107589344
>smart
>>
Why not have QOS on your router? That would be the correct way to do it.
>>
>>107589386
Different things.
>>
>>107589299
I just throttle large downloads to about 75% of my internet’s speed. Seems to be enough to avoid issues.
>>
File: speed test latency lte.png (466 KB, 1344x1780)
466 KB
466 KB PNG
My base latency is so high that any queue management is pointless.
This is in a medium city in England. Between the hours 20-22 the speed drops to 2-3 Mbit/s unless I lock the modem to a specific band on a specific tower which primarily serves an area with office buildings, pic related.
On the closest tower, the latencies often exceed 100ms under moderate load and 250ms under heavy load.
>>
>>107589402
But... the result is you can prioritize certain traffic. So that is the same.

Why would you complicate something that's already done for you? Many ordinary routers have this now, OpenWRT or whatever too of course.
>>
>>107589641
Still, two different things. Doing different things with different goals. You can have both at the same time.
https://www.reddit.com/r/techsupport/comments/134efkw/is_qos_the_same_as_sqm/
>>
>EA6350v3 on 500/500 fiber
Download is bloat free but upload has a little. Can't do anything about it without getting a new router since enabling sqm in openwrt cuts my speed to 150/150.
>>
>>107589930
Sounds like a CPU bottleneck, yeah.
>>
File: bb.png (127 KB, 732x315)
127 KB
127 KB PNG
>>107589299
https://www.waveform.com/tools/bufferbloat
>>
>>107589352
i think he means it slows down your speed if you use sqm, which it does
i don't game and sqm takes a lot of trial and error to fine tune it so i just left it off for max throughput
>>
>>107589965
Yeah, but you can fine tune it to take only like 5Mbps off the top of your max bandwidth and still get all the benefits.
Really bad bufferbloat actually become very noticeable even outside of gaming when you're stressing your connection.
>>
>>107589965
That's slowdown not latency tho
>>
>>107589327
this nigga sortin packets by hand
>>
>>107589668
Uhh pretty sure when you configure leaky bucket on a router device it's usually under qos, same for dscp. It's just how IT wanna call it.
>>
>>107589614
>medium city in England
>tower
Is this 4G/5G or fixed wireless? Either way, is it really your only option? No openreach/virgin/altnet FTTP, no virgin HFC, no decent VDSL?



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.