[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/g/ - Technology


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 💧.jpg (83 KB, 735x728)
83 KB
83 KB JPG
Programming is kinda over now. Why would I write code by hand if I can just open antigravity and specify in a few paragraphs the exact feature I want and have Claude Opus 4.5 or Gemini 3 Pro do it for me in a few minutes?
These agents are context aware, they can look up and follow patterns you've been using on your project. If they make mistakes, they have access to the linter that tells them exactly what's wrong and they fix their own errors. Furthermore, they write and execute their own unit tests.

I have mostly switched from a programmer to a prompter and code reviewer now.
>>
retard
>>
>>107592758
shut up, you fucking retard. you don't know what you're talking about. OP is right. for example, i wrote a shell function that removes audio from a webm using ffmpeg. I have no fucking idea how to use ffmpeg. But I just loaded up my .zshrc and typed in

>removeAudioFromWebm() {

and antigravity filled in the code for me. and it worked.

programmers are doomed unless they know how to work with AI better than the other programmers.
>>
>>107592777
all that you need to do is label things and the AI does the rest for you. as long as you write good comments and give your variables long, descriptive names, the AI will 100% be smart enough to write everything else.
>>
>>107592796
so you reached the point where you think naming and explaining rather than use your brain to think over it, i found the reason why most ai users are retarded
might as well stop studying mathematics and science since
>YESS YOU CAN SOLVE MATHS GOYYY, JUST EXPLAIN THE PROBLEM TO AIII
>YESS JUST EXPLAIN THE SCIENCE MANNN, WHO NEEDS TO UNDERSTAND SCIENCE!?!?!
holy kek, the absolute state
can't wait for (You) to become more retarded lmao
>>
>>107592567
Smart post unlike nilou
>>
>>107593028
Being a neet isn't a jobp
>>
>>107592777
The mistake you're making is thinking that running a fucking tool on the commandline has anything at all to do with programming or technical architecture. Let along debugging problems when they come up. Good luck tracking down a race condition in a process with 16 threads if you're a nocoder.
>>
>>107593157
he will probably tell it to just track the race condition, imagining it gives me laughs
>>
>>107592567
retard
>>
>>107592567
and what did you build by now? Anything to show?
>>
what ive noticed by trying it is that its good at creating things that are already there. But usually you want stuff that doesnt exist yet, which is the point of programing for me. Why just recreate when it already exists?
but ai is just not doing it. If it hasnt been fed into the model thousands of times it doesnt understand. Even if you are pretty far, the moment will come where it doesnt get further.
>>
>>107593157
I don't know what any of that means nigga lmao, I'm just gonna have AI fix it.
>>
>>107592567
You can make something functional for yourself in a short time but not something that you should use in a company. There will be a lot of bugs and vulnerabilities that you will not understand yourself and in the time you're asking for GPT to not hallucinate you will have a data leak or malware on your servers.
>>
>>107596117
>I don't know what any of that means nigga lmao
and that's why you would fail sooner or later stupid nigger



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.