[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/g/ - Technology


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


https://blogs.nvidia.com/blog/rtx-pro-5000-72gb-blackwell-gpu/

Why don't you have 72GB of VRAM, /g/?
>>
>>107593165
I found the creative writing abilities of recent LLMs to be stagnant and disappointing.
>>
>>107593679
Indeed, shallow and pedantic
>>
We are probably going to breach the 64-Bit barrier eventually with all the AI demand.
>>
I have a 128GB 395+ CPU. I do have 72 GB of vram
>>
>>107593165
>Why don't you have 72GB of VRAM, /g/?
Because I can't get that card at MSRP. I would immediately buy it if I could and by March I would be flooding this board with videos (with audio) of cute candid daddy daughter stretching and kissing and potty training vlogs

But I can't so I don't so I'm not, but it's incredibly invigorating to know that my little cutie heaven on earth is only less than 5 years away
>>
Why would I need more than 4x more VRAM than I have regular RAM?
>>
>>107593165
If NVIDIA weren't so jewish that they actually sold these cards to us or let us install our own memory chips, we would.
>>
>>107593165
so are these useless for gaming? or are they just way outside the budget of the average gamer?
>>
>>107593165
Because I have 96gb of fast enough integrated vram.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.