Is it good?
>>107604744It's just Fedora a version behind with Steam, some codecs and a nvidia driver...It's perfect.
>>107604744If you can think of reasons it's not good, you can write a dockerfile that makes it good. Like, if you have any Linux shell scripting ability at all.
>>107604744I's just fedora silverblue - tranny edition
>>107605025TIL skipping codecs and drivershit and layering many packages you'd already want for the target use case makes you a tranny, and tinkering with every new install is what seasoned male Linux users do.
>>107604744Yes, it's one of the only downstream distros I respect and even the fedora project mentions it. Fedora atomic is great, but because of their hardcore FOSS philosophy also a pain for consumers (codecs, proprietary QoL, kernel modules which are a pita on atomic distros and fixes in general, as well as the extra gaming related QA for regressions). It's perfect for a "Steam Machine" console like PC, but also decent as a desktop OS. I usually stick to Arch, Debian, Fedora and openSUSE, but mint and bazzite are an exception for recommendations.
it's fedora with steam and nvidia driver blobs packaged with itthey just cut ties with their handheld developer because some anime girl pfp troons thought he was too meanthere is no use case
>>107605983qrd?
