>remain as a low level language standard for 80 yearsWhy has nobody replaced it yet?
>>107607762Because it's not real. Assembly is just fancy markup for operations on you chip
>>107607762replace what?there isn't a single asm language, dipshit.
>>107607774ok genius explain how i can write programs that execute their own custom microcode
>>107608181what do you mean?
>>107608181>he thinks x86 asm is microcode
>>107607762Which ASM are we talking about? x86? ARM64? RISC-V? WASM?
>>107607762nice troll post
Either this is the lamest, cheapest attempt at ragebaiting I've ever seen in my life, or the technology field is starting to see a worrying outbreak of idiots. I genuinely hope is the first case. Whatever it is, you should seriously consider changing your hobbies, because you suck both at software and trolling.
>>107607762What is there to replace? You need more, use C, you need less, use hex/octal.
>>107610293Obviously the former. The latter would've had different red flags.Also while I'm at it, expect to see something like "transm" in the next OP.
>>107607762It's not a standard
