Software engineering will be a solved problem by the end of the decade
>>107609658>train image model>in 2035 ai's main job will be training other aiI want off this ride.
>>107609658I'm sorry, but the LLMs I chat with are still billigerently stupid. They give me solutions for vertx 3 when I'm on vertx 5.
>>107609658An ai tool is a powerful aide. like pass in a broken function, tell it x is broken and to fix it. But I still don't see where ai will do 100%, unless you want it to be broken jeet slop.
I hope they vibecode critical infrastructure I'm sure it will be so secure and reliable haha
>>107609658>50% of the time I too enjoy 50% buggy AI code over 10% buggy human code
>>107609684Note how it didn't say "train a model that is measurably and demonstrably better."
>>107609658can they solve the normal foss problems first? Like writing better drivers fixing plasmashell so it doesn't constantly crash enabling gdb hot reload like windows has etc. . Its always just some retarded shit thats been done already nothing new.
>>107609658>gpt write me a linux kernel rewrite in rust with all the features, make sure you create a nice desktop environment like windows, decompile all of windows and make sure wine works for every single game that was released in the past 25 years. Thank you for your service geepeetee. Pls finish within 24 hours without any bugs and CVEs
>>107609658These things are all lies. I fucking wish Opus 4.5 was that good but it isn't, it fucks up basic things and makes horrible design decisions.t. use Claude every day for work
>>107609949Just ask it again if it doesn't work the first time nbd
>>107609658it's been solved at least 70 years ago, retard
>>107610570>AI fucks up basic things makes horrible design decisions>still using it everyday
>>107609658It already is, software nowadays is only this way because companies are undergoing controlled decay propped up by stocks and subscription services.
>>107610757hey, C-suite wants to hear AI increases productivity by 500% and that's what they are going to hear, ok?
>>107610757I'm not going back to googling/stack overflow, I can get answers on shit in 10 seconds instead of 10 minutes (or more). It's also pretty good at code review and refactoring some messy function another programmer made and I don't want to spend time reorganizing into something legible.Having it write new code, however, it a bad idea unless it's something very simple and common at which point you usually can just do it yourself anyway.
>>107610801You won't learn because the best way of learning is active recall. Passive reading, be it AI code or any other code, barely sticks in your memory.
>>107609658Lmao imagine believing that
>>107609684these graphs are incredibly unexciting, nonsensical and you don't actually see what the data is, what is happening except vague claims. line goes up means good, especially for all of the people heavily invested into meme large language models, a literal dead end when it comes to artificial intelligence.
