>The burn-in is a non-issue nowadays
Do they really say that? I thought it was all about "WHAT, ARE YOU TOO POOR TO BUY A NEW MONITOR EVERY MONTH????"

>>107613441
The current meta is: "you need to leave your oled monitor powered on 24/7 in order to reduce burn in, update software, and run a strobe-epilepsy video for 9 hours every week."
I wish I was joking.

>>107613455
Do screensavers solve this?

>>107613411
MiniLED monitors are starting to reach 2000+ local dimming zones.
OLED will become obsolete before Microled replaces it.

>just werks
I didn't say it but I know you thought of LCD

>>107613411
What kind of nonsense, is going in with these panels. I refuse to believe this is legit burn in. The retention is too specific, you can almost read the text on some of those windows. I am convinced this retention is artificial, as in the hardware designed to reduce burn in, gets mis-calibrated and ends up doing the exact opposite of what its meant to.

>>107613411
I don't get it, all of the windows 9x screensavers still work to this day, why don't people use them
I have a version of the flying windows screensaver where I hex edited it to display the star wingding instead of the win3.1 wingding and I don't even own any OLEDs I just like having screensavers

>>107613856
OLED has been obsolete ever since Panasonic created the first dual-layered LCD

>>107613411
I haven't babysat or avoided using my PG32UCDM for "office work" for the past year and a half and there isn't a hint of uneven aging yet. Whenever it does get bad enough to notice (and it will), I'll just get another one. Which'll probably have an even more resilient panel by then.

>>107615036
>I'll just get another one
good goy

>>107613820
no, it's a joke
monitors have built in pixel cleaners now

>>107614594
Most likely it's the result of a burn-in test wherein they keep a static image on the screen for several years to assess worst-case burn-in. What you're seeing is why you should not use an OLED screen for computer work in which static elements are on the screen for a lot of the time and limit it to games and movies and such

>>107613411
I used an OLED TV as a monitor for 15 thousand hours and it didn't have ANY burn-in
the panel itself started to rot from top to bottom, so I bought another OLED TV
once you see those blacks you can't go back

Soooo is this a /g/meme or should I not buy an OLED monitor?

>>107613820
Yes and turning off monitor when the system is idle for x amount of time (10-30 minutes).
Burn-in is a self-inflicted issue from carelessness.

>>107613856
What do you think will come out first in an affordable capacity? Qdel or microled?

>>107613411
This is a faulty screen. You don't know what burn in is

>>107613856
miniled will never be a popular thing.

>>107615186
wanting to leave static images on your monitor for extended periods of time is not carelessness you dumb fucking faggot. A monitor should just fucking work

>>107615244
Yes, it is carelessness. Burn-in (CRT/OLED) and image persistence (LCD) are facts of life. Being subjected to both is purely carelessness and 100% skill issue.