is AI worth it if it is guaranteed to end humanity?
>>107641265Yes.
It can only read things we've already written. Copy things we've already made. And when it runs out of original data, it Coppys itself. Creating a feedback loop that degrades its own data set. It's like being afraid of the photocopier.
>>107641265>guaranteed to end humanityAnd that's a good thing!
>>107642340AI won't completely wipe out humanity, but slowly replace it. It's going to be like Megaman X where humans will be replaced by humanoid robots who act basically the same as us because that's what they've been trained to do, and those that try to overcome the limits of their programming will be hunted down and destroyed for being "dangerous".
>>107641265Only if by "end humanity" you mean tech billionaires and their families slaughtered in the streets, sure.
>>107641265I mean, at this rate, pajeets and brownoids will overtake and end whites which will "end humanity" in a way, and all other east asians will die out while only china remains. so that would be the last "humanity" but in name only, everything else that makes humanity worth living will be gone.so if AI ends all of humanity before then at least the world won't be a brown-chink dystopia.
Who cares. I'm ready to die. Not my problem.
>>107641265>if it is guaranteed to end humanity?>ifthere's no conceivable reason for a true adaptable AI to not end humanity, the whole "field" of AI security/alignment has been screaming about this for decades. all roads lead to paperclip universe.but the corpos can't just stop. even the tiniest chance that they will get an AI that obeys them and win everything forever is worth it compared to the possibility that their competitors get there first.
>>107642458i bet you feel really smart, really clever. you're not, you're a decadent faggot and learned to wipe just yesterday, eat shit
