I forced AI to break circular definitions in physics and act as a Game Designer for reality.It ended up writing a "Universe Engine" technical doc and actual code.We tested a 128x128x128 slice. Newtonian gravity emerged automatically from base constants.It's not perfect, but it works.I don't have the compute power to run a larger simulation.Need someone with hardware to compile and test this properly.Repo: https://github.com/JulianZoria/Universe-Engine
>>107649964>from base constantsEmerged my ass
AI induced schizophrenia is going to kill millions of people.
The repo has the full TDD, formulas, and calculations. Why the fuck would I waste my time posting here if I didn't have the receipts? Check the code.
>AIfuck off
>>107649964meds
>>107649964>I’m not a physicist>im just a retard who vibe coded some literal schizobabble and thinks it means anythingTheres no way this isnt satire right? Chat gpt telling you that something works out doesnt mean anything, llms are designed to be sycophants and make shit up in order to make you feel smart and keep using them.
bro needs to be in a mental institution fr, y'all
BEHOLD YOUR NEW GOD
>>107649964what is this slice you like 128mm2 open end or something crazy
>Look at the standard definitions taught in school: Force: Causes change in momentum. Momentum: Mass × Velocity (changed by force). Mass: Resistance to force (Inertia). Inertia: Resistance to change in momentum.>It’s a tautology! A circular logic loop that explains nothing. X is defined by Y , and Y by X . No wonder the AIs were stuck in infinite loops — they were trained on this circular logicThis is legitimately the most midwit thing I have ever read. You are just smart enough to understand that these concepts exist but too stupid to think you have stumbled upon some kind of inherant paradox or tautology rather than YOU just not understanding VERY BASIC PHYSICS. VERY BASIC. HIGHSCHOOL LEVEL PHYSICS.
>>107650094The repo is some kind of fork of a game, possibly a rhytm game or visual novel. It's clearly satire/trolling.
>>107650139https://zenodo.org/records/18019788i dont think its satire, he literally published it here
this changes EVERYTHING :rocket:
It's not a rhythm game, retard. Look at [universe_engine_reference_impl.py]. It generates the data structure.Compile it or stay poor.
Reminds me of that ai loop horror OS lol. Same vibes.
>>107649964>t.
I open-sourced the Universe Engine for everyone.You want to be a god? Stop shitposting and compile the code.Test it yourself.
If you don't see the circular logic here, you are a literal brainlet.Even physicists admit these definitions are tautological.Google 'tautology in Newton's laws' or 'circular definition of force and mass' before opening your mouth.You are too stupid to be here. Lurk more, retard.
>>107649964OP, I skimmed through your implementation. While I didn't understand the whole thing, it appears like the reason you get gravity out of it is that you've defined a field of mass density vectors, and then simply run optimization passes on those.Of course you're going to get gravity out of that. Gravity acts the same way.If you want to actually make a breakthrough in physics, you need to make a testable prediction, not just simply restate gravity with a bunch of schizo shit around it.For example, if you could take astronomical data and plug it into your simulation, and then get very close to the observed gravity of dark matter, then you'd have something significant.If you can't make testable predictions, then it's just schizophrenia.
>>107650488>schizo retard pseudo intellectual midwit gets called out for being a retard>doesnt even know how to reply to people>calls others retards>tells them to lurk moreyou cant even make this shit up
Of course you're going to get gravity out of that.That's exactly the point.Modern science has no answer for how gravity works or even what it is (it just describes the curvature).This program is interesting precisely because it demonstrates the mechanism: gravity is the result of field optimization.It shows how it acts, not just that it acts.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_field
>>107650488>>107650714Maybe I can put it this way, you've literally done the exact same circular logic thing you're describing.You've taken a field of mass density and run energy optimization passes on it, which is the standard way of defining a gravitational field. It's just that yours is a slow implementation with extra schizophrenia. >>107650757
>>107650784You are confusing the RESULT with the INPUT.Standard physics starts with the formula/definition.My code starts with only the grid and the constants.I didn't tell it to 'simulate gravity'. I told it to 'optimize energy'.Gravity emerged as the most efficient state.That is NOT circular. That is derivation from first principles.And yes, it's slow. It's a proof of concept in Python, not a game engine.
>>107649964You're just trying to reinvent relativity.
