ITT: We post distros used by insecure people who want to use Arch but don't want to get made fun of for using Arch
>>107650456the irony
>>107650456i use both fedora and arch i dont get itwhy would i be made fun of for using either
>>107650456Post distros feared by the State of Israel
>>107650456fedora is the preferred distro by linus
>>107650456arch users are powerful
>>107650456I used to be the kind of geek who uses Arch, back when all distros allowed (and required) as much configuration as Arch. Now I use vanilla Ubuntu even though I hate Snap because I don't have to think about the OS at all.
>>107650686GAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAY!!! Buy a mac fag!
>>107650701>buyno
>>107650686This. I don't want to tinker with my OS anymore, I just want it to work (and be free, and not require company-specific hardware, and not have ads, etc.)
>>107650456why would we be insecure? fedora is a working and serious distro unlike arch (which is a toy). we get the peace of mind that comes from stability (tested software) and the last features that come with its updated repos.
>>107650774You sound like an insecure faggot
>>107650867answer the question, nigger.
>>107650883Because you project and use an OS for your ego>I'm le based because I use Fedora unlike those Arch redditors!That's the same mentality on the flipside of the coin as those Arch fanboys who blurt out "I use arch btw" constantly
>>107650774It's literally not stable, tested software, You are the beta tester. You're an unpaid beta tester for packages that may become part of RHEL later.
>>107650774How does Red Hat cock feel in your ass, faggot?
>>107650896
>>107650898>whats rawride>>107650906its quite the opposite, ALL distros suck Red Hat cock, specially arch.
>>107650943>>107650974>No you!I accept your concession
read OP again, projecting negro.
>>107650898as opposed to other software where you pay to beta test it except no one cares about your feedback
>>107650686SameI chose Ubuntu because it's the official target for docker, I could probably use something else but I can't be fucked finding out It just werks
>>107650456Reminder that the world's #1 supercomputer is based on Fedora GNU/Linux
>>107651165arent snaps a pain? or you can choose not to use?
>>107651193I just don't interact with them at all, maybe one day they'll be mandatory, I think in the base install includes Firefox in a snap, but it's just whatever, it still works as a web browser, and certainly works well enough to look up whatever is the recommended browser on the g wiki and then just install that normally
>>107651193Snaps aren't difficult, they're just a solution in search of a problem and a retarded waste of disk space. There aren't .deb packages in the official repo for some apps, including Firefox. You could add a PPA if you wanted to.
>>107651233how can ubuntu just werk if you can't even get firefox from an official repo? on fedora it comes preinstalled and you can remove it and get the flatpak or even the snap if you want
>>107651233>You could add a PPA if you wanted toive read somewhere that PPAs are also a pain and thats why debian dont use it kek (even tho you guys are close). so how does that work?>>107651242flats are just so fucking easy to manage, if its not in the repos i can always find it on flathub. maybe them can use it too.
>>107650571any cottonplantase
>>107650456I've lost enough time with Fedora already. I don't want to recompile the kernel, I have a job.
