Computers and Gaming hardware in general haven't become better, they just scaled up and brute forced their way to cope with inefficient software
I mean, they're made to turn shapes into pixels, and that's what they all do, so it's correct but a trivial correct, not an earth shattering relevatory correct
>>107662658Ok but if efficiency kept up with the way raw compute keeps improving then the PS5 wouldn't be massive and require excessive cooling and a giant heatsink
>>107662667PS5 is bone slow
>>107662671That's just retarded and tech illiterate to say
>>107662675You never saw the benchmarks huhthis is clocked to pro level
>>107662696Even if it is indeed the PS5 CPU it's still a lobotomized chip running behind layers of Windows bloat vs close to the metal Unix Try again
>>107662714running synthetic benchmarks*also lacks cache which may not be important for desktop workloads
>>107662714You can check passmark or geekbench results, both have native linux builds.It's a bad chip with even worse memory. It retains the 4+4 ccx business of zen 2 with the tiny cache of laptop chips.
>>107662641Sort of. Things were actually improving and getting more streamlined until around 2018 or 2019. When raytracing and crypto mining became the big fad mixed with covid supply crunches is when everything GPU and software related started to become bloated shit. GTX 1050 was the peak of human civilization and that came out in 2016.
>>107662730It can't a bad chip when its predecessor was running a bulldozer architecture FX chip but somehow was running games fine for its time at 30fps...
>>107662741Ps4 was not bulldozer and it was as fast as pentium 4, complete joke of a cpu for a computer released in 2013
