Anyone else get one of these year end review things from ChatGPT? What did it think about youTop 3% of chatters btw
>>107666098Top of 3% zogbots?Congarts
>giving it access to memory and signing up to help train GPTlook I am not going to do the all AI bad screeching some tards will do but this is dumb
>>107666122what your year in review should look like
>>107666098Using AI for more than translation is just too pajeet-coded for me sorry.
I don’t like having memory enabled
KILL YOURSELF AIJEET
>>107666098I'd like to know what it says for users who use it for gooning
>>107666122none of my data is usable to train on either ite just basic q&a or me calling the chatbot a retarded nigger
>>107666223all data is trainable on, it's learning how to interact with morons from you
>>107666098>Unga bunga
>>107666098Sorry, not getting it, as I have "private" AI corpo instance thanks to me running my moderate sized consulting company. Our corpo have several instances, and I got one instance just for myself, sure it costs hundreds of bucks a month ,but we can afford it. Is it any good?Still haven't implemented it in anyhting other than fancy spellcheck and email writer. That's about it's real use. Coding sucks and still has to be reviewed by employee.
>>107666273no, quality of data matters. Token saturation results in worse responses
>>107666098
>>107666223In ChatGPT's defence, it IS a retarded nigger
>>107666098> *rings*> "hello, is this the based department"> oh, why yes; it is. and this is the CEO speaking
>>107666098I just deleted it without looking at it.
>>107666183>>107666799You can disable memory at any point. You can enable it to make the your year thing then disable it afterward
>>107666902why did you respond to me
>>107666933Because you said "I don’t like having memory enabled"
>>107666098I haven't gotten anything like this and I've been using chatgpt a lot ever since it came out
>>107667291ask it for it
>>107666098I was the first 1% but only in the top 15%I got this archetype cos I vibe coded some dumb scripts for my website and did some docker troubleshooting
>>107666098>Top 3% of chatters btwgood lord I'm in the top 1% of users
>>107666098No. I've never used ChatGPT.
>>107667513Oh well this explains it. I did frequently spend quite a bit of time convincing it that it was gaslighting me and doing bad calculations
>>107667481> 1%*kneels for based cybergod*
>>107667481first 0.1% here, only top 3% messages sent. engineer like >>107666785. checking my password manager I made the account early Dec 2022.
>>107667569how many sexts have you sent chatgpt though?
>>107667589that's what >>>/lmg/ is for
>>107666098maybe AI is okay, because I really thought this was the best one of these yet. Felt really personal.
