Still the most futuristic versions of Windows/Office to date!
The Ribbon is hard mode, I still don't know where some of the settings are. It took me until last year to figure out that Outlook shows different ribbon items if you "pop out" a draft email.
>>107673618it's crazy how everything in 7 looks so clean and tidy8, 10 and 11 are a fucking mess
>>107673618>looks old>futuristic
>>107673725>Older Version Number>Must necessarily look old>Ignore the actual styling
>>107673686Some buttons being bigger or smaller than others for seemingly no reason always triggered my autism. I stuck to Office 2003 for ages before switching to LibreOffice just to avoid using this schizo UI.
>>107673813> randomly big buttonsWhat got me was how much space Word dedicated to the Style portion. I like Word's style system, I rarely use it but it's good. Nobody needs giant preview buttons for 5 styles taking up half the ribbon.
>>107673618>looks 20 years old>because it's 20 years old>"futuristic"
>>107674000And yet it still beats modern windows/office!
>>107674200You can make that claim if you like (you'd still be wrong though), but it's just a goalpost-shuffle from lt "looking futuristic", and that's an even bigger pile of copium-infused horseshit.
>>107674250None of that is true! Those old graphics hold up better than so-called modern ones
>>107673618posted again award
>>107673618>posts a screenshot of "the most futuristic version of Windows">a screenshot featuring fuckhuge Win10+ DWM caption buttons, janky high DPI issues, inaccurate taskbar button margins, a tiny Start orb, and Office 2007, even though it was designed for Vista instead of 7Anon, if you wanted to show off your epic Windows 10 -> 7 conversion on [Current Year] /g/, you could've at least done more research and put one together that doesn't fucking suck
>>107674671Not a conversion, it's 7, but it is high dpi, yes
>>107674671Windows 7 had GUI scaling!
