He posts hereDon't ask me how I know thisHe authored MINIX, his work used to create Intel MEI think it speaks to the quality of MINIX that Intel ME went as long as it did without an RCE, even when Intel ME was obviously mostly orchestrated by Intel's Engineering team (corporate software is notoriuously shit, and the developers who work in such enterprises often lackluster themselves)Yet Tannanbaum's core was so good even they managed to keep ring -3 safe for what, a decade?what do you cocksuckers think, he posts here, and i'm sure he'll respond
>>107679893>He posts hereHow do you know this?
>>107679893Is this the one whose mum died in the holly?
>>107679959How good is your pattern recognition, how much time do you have to read, do you have a good attention span, and do you have high pattern recognition?Answer honestly all these questions.If you aren't sure, say no.
>>1076798931. published non-trivial open sores software which AI labs are now using to train LLMs to rape programmer job market and devalue programming skills and labor.2. published with a cuck license that is basically inviting corporate exploitationim sure his microkernel is cool but he made some very bad decisions.
>>107680019>i would love to tell you about my baseless claim, but i'm just too le smart and i've got a backlog of rick and morty to get through
I enjoyed his flamewars with linus, but most of all I loved his book structured computer organization. Taught me more than almost any teacher ever did..
>>107680054Are any CS textbooks actually worth reading? The feeling I get from this board is that people here like to make it sound like you can just grok your way through any codebase by opening man pages.I did go through some math and physics textbooks in college, but only because my instructors assigned specific problem sets from those textbooks, but then again, I always got the feeling that computer programming (as opposed to math) was just something you needed to practice rather than to really gain conceptual understanding on.
