>>107680992Reminder that cshart is currently being vibe coded. Never trust m$.
>vargood morning benchod saar do not redeem
>>107681372why do timmycels on this site think any PL concept came after K&R 89 is bad? is it because that's the only thing they can manage to grasp without succumbing into timmy rage?
>>107680992>wonbill gates said that users only need basic, visual basic
>>107681734he was right
>>107681387It's all part of the LARP as primitive manly man
>>107681809>It's all part of the LARPno it's not LARP, they're genuinely getting into arguments about it like a retard
>>107681809>>107681849>It's all part of the LARP as primitive manly manI hate cniles and you are clearly a javascript jeet, var is literally useless in C# when you can literally omit the constructor name from new()You are just a lazy bum who needs the computer to deduce a type for you when it should be obvious enough to write>inb4 var isnt dynamic typingThat’s not the pointThe point is that it conveys no information
>>107682051>The point is that it conveys no informationneither does new(), dumbass, it's only a matter of whether you want that information on the left or the right and most people would find var prettier, given that's also how it's done in a lot of other programming languages (Scala is one that comes to mind)
>>107680992what did they win and why should I care about it
>>107682051>>inb4 var isnt dynamic typing>That’s not the pointyou debunked yourself in your post by pointing out it's a syntactical sugar.>The point is that it conveys no informationthere's no semantic loss from using type inferrence, otherwise it wouldn't be called syntactical sugar. you're a retard ass timmy lmao.
>>107682066Best Builder 2025 award
>>107680992Won what? Now make a module using top level syntax.
>>107681777users are data. wtf they doin coding anything? inventing "user friendly" languages is a shunt to ground
>>107682297many CAD and office programs used to come with VBA scripting. not every user is a drooling retard.
>>107682317>VBA scriptingthe sheer mass of absolute crap produced with that far outweighs the good. the "good" is an extreme outlier. the people that provide actual benefit with it would do so regardless of its existence, with pencil and paper if need be. maybe there's a whole bunch of actuaries whose entire career is based on some vba macro written by "the geek", and those guys progress into senior leadership. while the geek's desk is in the basement. some shit like that
