Talk about hypocrisy...
>>107685597They're just trying to feed their family!
this is not an IP issue, it's a license issue
>noooooo what do you mean that software licenses aren't just decoration for my github dotfiles repo and they actually mean something
>>107685597>Anti-IP mfs when you infringe on their IPHaven't we seen that with AI, the same people who have shit on companies like Nintendo are now complaining about it.It truly shows how many don't have an backbone what so ever and go with what is popular instead.
>>107685597>>107685597All they had to do was leave the authorship intact and change the project to LGPL or a compatible license.Its already fucking free to use, they benefited from not having to write any of it from scratch, the least they can do is publish their changes upstream.
>>107685597people using (L)GPL are not anti-IP, those licenses literally exist to retain IP attribution
>>107685681>Haven't we seen that with AI, the same people who have shit on companies like Nintendo are now complaining about it.so you really think that there's no practical difference between ai companies mass scraping people's original content for their paid datasets and people making free fangames by themselves?
>>107685597All this whining is starting to make me feel like the GPL is actually based
>>107685876>>107685597Next time I use gpl code, I'm gonna wash it through AI and not even release the source code.
>>107685597The difference is that I don't care if a multi billion dollar company losses profits
>>107685872>so you really think that there's no practical difference between ai companies mass scraping people's original content for their paid datasets and people making free fangames by themselves?>immediately derails it by making about some moral issue rather than looking at it form a factual/ legal way.There is no difference.What so ever, you are in both cases violating IP law.Your argument is emotional not based on logic.To me all of this sounds like it's okay when I do it, but when someone else does it, it becomes a problem.
>>107685920Way to ensure that your version is thoroughly inferior.
>>107685966Don't care, first movers have the advantage. Good luck competing with me once I've locked down your potential customers in 5 year contracts and 5000 miles of ai red tape. And if you manage to talk to them, I'll drop my prices 50% faggot.
>>107685655Licenses are literally downstream of IP.There is nothing more capitalistic.FOSS ""communists"" are uber retarded.
>>107685920>>107685994>bragging about stealingLiteral nigger behavior
>>107686023you have absolutely no idea what you're talking about. Nobody is claiming ownership of this code. There is no "intellectual property" here
>>107685994>Don't care, first movers have the advantageThis is what the AI shills always say before releasing a buggy heap that all their customers quickly grow to despise using. And once your app is a clusterfuck of frameworks barely held together, it's destined to be shit unless you throw it out and rewrite it from the ground up.
>>107686023>Licenses are literally downstream of IP.>There is nothing more capitalistic.>FOSS ""communists"" are uber retarded.What do you mean? Communists aren't against IP or copyright.
>>107686080>And once your app is a clusterfuck of frameworks barely held together, it's destined to be shit unless you throw it out and rewrite it from the ground up.Yeah bro just two more weeks.
>>107686067Oh yeah there is, without copyright there would be no GPL enforcement.
>>107686126GPL is basically the opposite of copyright, please stop posting already
>>107685597They did it! They defeated MPEG-LA, Broadcom, Qualcomm and all video coding patents!!! Oh wait... They did the exact opposite. The literally brought more power to the former and hamstrung one of the cheapest video coding capable SoCs out there. Great work!
>>107686139BSD or MIT are the opposite of copyright, GPL needs copyright.
>>107686086FOSS doesn't exist without property rights.Licenses don't exist without property rights.
>>107686157Even BSD and MIT, if you're a true commie, you just put out the code for the public good.Are they brave enough to do that?
>>107685928Commie.
>>107685597kek. GPL is retarded.the chinese will take it anyway.IP as a concept just doesn't work and AI is accelerating its demise.if you wanna control your code then you should keep it secret not release it with a mickey mouse "license" attached that nobody cares about.
>>107686459>NOOOOOOOO LEAVE MY MULTI BILLION DOLLAR COMPANIES ALONEAbsolute state of mutts
>>107686519>IP as a concept just doesn't workHave you tried living in a first world country where your creations will be protected for 80+ years?
>>107686663You are not a man if you need to be protected by others.And your creations are not creations if they can't survive someone pressing ctrl-v on the keyboard.
>>107686663Did you mean to prove his point for him?
>>107686023not even chatgpt can hallucinate this shit so bad
>shitty chink companies always go out of their way to make the shittiest drivers possible full of propietary hacks and bugsWhy dont they just implement vaapi like intel and amd do?
GPLoids will tell you this is a crime. Go clean it up license jannies.https://github.com/HermanChen/mpphttps://gitee.com/hermanchen82/mpp
>>107685597well doneGPL is the only free license
>>107685597They should have just laundered the code through an LLM.
>>107685597>LGPL 2.1+>GPLv2 OR LATERWhat did the company actually do wrong?
>>107685597Objectively speaking how does it hurt ffmpeg if their code is directly used by other projects?
>>107687035It depends on the three GPL licenses that may have been used - no one has specified that.Linus stayed on GPLv2 ONLY for that ambiguity.
>>107685963It depends on if a company or individual is making money from it.
>>107686023>>107685597You are just a really really dumb person if you honestly believe what you write.It is surprising that you are capable of using 4chan in the first place.
>>107687143Love the amount of seethe this license shit generates every time it comes up.Meanwhile the chinese just take your shit, do whatever they want with it and then sell it back to you.Kek!
>>107687035The developers suffer unimaginable pain and suffering.
>>107686023Despite all the shit you are getting, you are technically correct, but the more descriptive term isSHARE ALIKEThe concept of enforceable property means you can force others to accept your same terms."share alike."
>>107687215"Free as in free speech"is aligned with the permissive licenses - which have their own "leeching" problems.
>>107685994Women are so painfully delusional. You know what's out there? Millions of the brightest minds of our generation and the previous thousand generations optimizing AI specifically designed to rape you and mind break you. Women have no chance and will flock to become rape toys.
If you don't want someone to use your code, don't put your code on the internet.
>>107687319Or any binary, or sell it cause they will just reverse engineer it.
>>107687319Yes. This is the obvious truth.Fags will cry about it endlessly.
>>107687319That's the whole reason behind the BSD, MIT etc licenses, but it's only partially true.
>>107687035>Objectively speaking how does it hurt ffmpeg if their code is directly used by other projects?It's a bit like immigration anon.GPL says you can come to my country freely, you just have to pull your weight.Cuck licenses say come to my country, use up and destroy what I built, contribute nothing, that's all fine.
>>107685597based
>>107686023>>107685597ffmpeg hasn't infringed on IP, only patents. Patents are just on paper, they didn't copy any code. rockchip on the other hand straight up copied their code.
>>107685597>anti-ipthe fook are you talking about mate?ffmpeg dudes have never been anti-ip lmao
>>107686126Lmao what a fucking retard.If IP was abolished, the GPL wouldn't need to exist. The entire reason for the GPL is to "simulate" the absence of IP in the current legal framework
>>107686023everything is downstream of IP you fucking muppet ass fuckwit
>>107687067who?
