we need a gpl v4/lgpl v4/agpl v4 with clauses on ai trainingand a gpl v2.5 with the same but no tivoization clausesany model trained on this code must only produce code licensed as GPL or a compatible copy left licensewould solve corpo use of ai honestly
>>107691230AI already isn't permitted to redistribute code it's trained on without attribution. It's already violated.
>>107691230Do you really think they would care about it? I don't think they would.Facebook has already showed that they don't care about breaking the law to train their AI. I don't think the US government will do anything about it. Doing something about it would mean potentially losing the AI race to China. American laws don't apply in China, so they would not care to follow it anyway.
>>107691372it's still in a gray area. but technically, if you were to accidentally produce a perfect reproduction of licensed code, the generated code would have to be under the same license.
>>107692321its an evolution/refactor of existing gpl code, because it was trained on it, so gpl should apply
>>107691230>would solve corpo use of ai honestlyAI companies give exactly zero fucks about whether they're permitted to use your data for training, they'll do so anyway.
>>107691230everything should be MIT, including the private sector. characters in memory are not IP.
>>107692412Wouldn’t be a problem if the government prosecuted them properly
