To what extent is this true? I understand how it will and does trim the number of low level code monkeys but if you are compotent shouldn't it just boost your output?
Evolution made AGI out of rocks and sunlight and water over a few billion years, just through blind selection. That's how easy AGI is. You can literally brute-force it from nothing. It just seems hard to us because our gigantic egos don't want to accept that we're not special in the slightest. Also, thinking feels hard to us because we're approximately a minimally viable AGI. Thinking is actually cheap and easy; we're just incredibly dumb animals.
>>107692039You got it in one.
>>107692039It's a gaint hypothetical, that we will have AGI and AGI is according to 'them' equal to a human. So you don't need a programmer or an accountant or much else with soft work. there will still be 'hard' work till we figure out how robots can do this for us. then these fags are on the chopping block. This is assuming we will get there and they aren't watering down the meaning. To have AGI by 2030.We don't have the energy for that type of scaling.
>>107692039It's true to the extent that most people aren't competent.
>>107692039is it?they (the engineering managers) are still desperate to find a problem that the copilot licenses the company bought could be applied tothat perfect refactor case it won't fuck up or simply longer and more tediousthey also reactively hire more jeets (5 jeets per 1 white) when the when delivery eventually slows downeverything is still planned via the same old crusty ms excel sheetsthat's my experience in a company you've heard ofit's weird, in contrast to all the shilling /g/ gets spammed with
>>107692039you IT monkeys are doomedDOOMED!
