>Sandboxing is mandatory for all Mac App Store appsIs this why all /g/poos hate on macOS?You can't hack it as easily as linux/windows?
>>107693238no its bc you cant upgrade them
>>107693238>>>/lgbt/
>>107693544Is that really Apple's fault that everyone else makes the continuous, conscious choice glaze the ever living fuck out of their design decisions?
>>107693238nobody uses the macOS App Store, althoughbeitever
>>107693623yes and noyour duty (or dharma if you are into buddhism) as a consumer grade technology vendor is to create products that are useful to your customers and arent detrimental to the future of the humanity these two are the main ones, you can also add "benefit your nation" or "ecofascism" to that list as well if thats your cup of teaapple products are:>sub optimal when it comes to being useful >net negative when it comes to "humanitys future and well being" in the presence of alternatives>net negative when it comes to environmentalism>net negative when it comes to nation's interests>net negative when it comes to human rightsso yes it is other vendors fault for being niggercattle oriented but its also apple's fault for not doing what is right for everyone
>>107693740>net negative when it comes to environmentalismWrong>net negative when it comes to nation's interestsWrong, it's company, companies have no national interest.>>net negative when it comes to "humanitys future and well being" in the presence of alternativesSchizophrenia>>net negative when it comes to human rightsSchizobabble
for any zoom zooms that might be readingthe way how you go about debates and arguments is you present your counterargument to your opponents arguments when you are doing that your argument is supposed to be logically consistent and contain factual informationif it isnt your opponent will attack either logical fallacies or factual inaccuracies in your argument or even bothgoing "NO UR WRONG" like this 14 y.o. "le epik troll" over here >>107693830 will just signal to everyone that you are a mental midget or a troll and you will be simply ignored or laughed at in any conversation with anyone who has triple digit iq
>>107693238Linux offers choice. I can have a secure computer that surpasses that of Apple's (some here have been convinced otherwise for silly reasons). Those with strong opinions about Linux aren't proficient with using a terminal or follow instructions/remember commands. I don't want Apple telling me what to do with a computer. If you're truly interested in a secure Linux computer, general information is easily available.
>>107693722macOS also requires sandboxing for non-App store installed apps.
>>107694000>DON'T trust APPLE!!>>LINUX IS SUPERIOR SINCE YOU HAVE TO RELY ON RANDOM GITHUB USERS, ANONS WITH FURRY AVATARS, TRANNIES AND COMPANIES LIKE REDHAT, IBM, ORACLE, HUAWEI, INTEL, AMD!!!
>>107694233And you see an issue with this why? Having choices is great when only trusting is no longer acceptable. I have the ability to verify and this increases security.
>>107694797Apple is serious about security; they invest a lot in white hat hackers. What’s the Linux Foundation’s budget for this?
>>107694831There is a greater incentive to ensure security for Linux as it's more important infrastructure than a macOS computer. A budget is not necessary as a lot is free and open source that even Apple has greatly benefited from.
>>107694233>YOU HAVE TO RELY ON RANDOM GITHUB USERSBut I dont have to rely on random github users, I rely on redhat/ibm/fedora employees for the most part.
