can we go back to using RAM as an SSD?
>>107694641sure, go ahead
>>107694641It was more of a gimmick of a product. You were bottlenecked by the SATA 1.0 interface, not to mention no AHCI. An actual SCSI SSD around the same time made much more sense, even if it was more expensive.
slightly-VME
>>107694665>pci>sata interfacelol
>>107694674Absolute fucking drooling retard, go away.
>>107694665this. if you don't care about volatility and just need to have that one shitty program not be bottleneck by ssd read/write speed, juse make a ramdisk. you don't need any special hardware to do that
Ram disks were never a thing.
>>107694641Wouldn't you lose your data on there as soon as you restarted the PC?
>>107694641With CXL you can use RAM as RAM(extra NUMA node).
>>107694641We can't use RAM as RAM these days, shit is so expensive
>>107694803You can literally see the battery included in the board to avoid that.
>>107694721Works on my machine
>>107694869>4 GB
>>107694869>R:Cute drive letter, anon. Does it stand for "Retarded"?
>>107694803No, you would lose it if power is removed and the battery runs out.
>>107694919OP's is like 2GB
>>107694641you have to wait until the AI bubble pops first
>>107694641Man I wish there was a way I could store the program I'm currently using on RAM
>>1076951042GB in 1999-2002 was ok, 4 GB in 2026-3 days is not.
>>107695282OPs thingy is from 2006
>>107695282XP came out in 2001 and a typical *just OS* install was 1.7GB.
>>107694869Usecase? Or did you just make it for this screenshot?
