>>107698082
trvvve

>pic unrelated

They should have a functionality where it hooks into your distro's repo and AUR and checks if it's available there
It's a great concept and it should be transformed into a one stop shop for software

>>107698168
Go back to windows you shitter. No wonder you use arch.

>>107698173
>Arch bad but I also want software installation to be obtuse and require prescience

>>107698192
Go back, winjeet shitter.

>>107698207
Maybe try some constructive criticism instead of shitting yourself?
Being able to have one application that taps into every single source of software would be much better than having to do that separately

>>107698237
Maybe try not being a shitter. You arch trannies need to go back.

>>107698268
Maybe stop being a retard? Do you even speak English? I've never said I can't browse and download shit off my repos or AUR
There's objectively no reason that bazaar shouldn't be able to be an all in one that only serves you flatpaks if nothing else is available

>>107698082
That's not Guix

>>107698308
>That's not Guix
That'd be a great name for an operating system.

https://flatkill.org/
/thread

>>107698313
Keep crying, maybe you'll arrive at a counterargument sometime instead of this buzzword spam
Do you think you deserve a trophy for using Gentoo?

>>107698328
>Noooo don't make fun of my gender. I'm a real femboy!!!!!!

>>107698336
What distro could you possibly be on to have a stick wedged this firmly up your ass?
Do you think browsing the repo makes you an elite hacker or something when it's the same process as bazaar?

>>107698365
Of course a tranny things about stuff going up people's asses.
Try not to touch any little kids this week.

>>107698380
You're too fucking stupid to even try to argue your case
Are you some Microsoft shill sent to make Linux people look bad?

>>107698389
I really like you, girl. But I hate the AUR... I don't want 1 stop for applications.
>Microjeet Winshit
Check the store, if the app isn't there, hunt the .exe or winget.
>Crapple
If the app isn't in the store, hunt the .dmg or use brew.
>Loonix
If the app isn't in the store use your package manager or hunt the .appimage.

>>107698389
>>107698389
Btw, NTA, baby. And I wanted to mention: Build from source, but thats always the last option.

>>107698418
What could possibly be the benefit of having to search multiple places when you could have one that queries them all at once and lets you pick the source

>>107698452
I mean in a dream world, every software would be packaged in one repo, but I'm a hardcore flatpak faggot and I go flatpak first, if my app isn't available, I'll go for my package manager.
>archie chan
you can just use your paru/yay :3
Linux Mint already displays Fatpaks and deb package manager software in one store, just like ubuntu, fedora etc.

>>107698489
Yes, that's what I'd want, for bazaar to be a universal software browser and then there would be a button that says download from arch repo that pops out a terminal with the command to install it pre typed

>>107698510
sounds good, baby

File: flatpaklie.png (35 KB, 865x155)

35 KB PNG

>>107698320
Actually this is false, plain lie for most apps.

Seems like a disingenous website.
Sorry chud but KDE+flatpak discover IS the future of linux.

No more fragmentation

>>107698082
Usecase for choking on your spit, you drooling retard?

File: flatpakstrat.png (89 KB, 528x885)

89 KB PNG

>>107698082
now I can keep using GIMP 3.0.4 and Minetest from 2020 forever thanks to Flatpak's backward compatibility. Just make sure to rename the folder

File: appimage_does_not_need_pr(...).png (12 KB, 250x76)

12 KB PNG

>>107698082
oh, sorry guys! it's me, OP!
I meant to post THIS image!
I suck huge cocks!

File: i-have-always-wondered-ho(...).jpg (114 KB, 1080x810)

114 KB JPG

I don't get the appeal after using it and discover, just feels like installing stuff from the terminal but with GUI stuff which I get if you're a normalGOD and don't wanna fuck with a terminal but copy pasting commands feels super snappy and it way more convenient than having to download a zip, extracting the zip, running the installer, going through the wizard, then opening the program

Snaps ask for missing permissions and run like normal programs
Flatpaks just break or do nothing when a permission is missing and require aliases to run.
Snaps won.

>>107698608
Flatseal can easily manage this anyways

>>107699240
Just use "warehouse"
thank me later

>>107699315
snaps take up a stupid amount of storage space. idk if flatpak is any better, I've never tried it, but fuck snaps.

>>107699439
>snaps take up a stupid amount of storage space.
Are you going to substantiate this or should I just dismiss it.

>>107699565
If you have any idea how snaps actually work, you wouldn't need to have it substantiated. And if you don't know how they work, you shouldn't be arguing in a package container thread in the first place. So either way, you're in the wrong.

>>107699588
I'm well aware of how they work, I know why they are larger, I want you to substantiate what 'stupid' is with comparisons. You also just randomly throw out a 'fuck snaps' without justification because it's the cool thing to do.