>>107704398
It's simple, just move to jpeg-xl for personal files.
And webp for the web till jpeg-xl gets supported online.
>But that's too much
On the web right now we have gif,jpg and png as a standard.

You don't move to any one format, recently it has come to my attention that png sometimes completely beats both webp and jpeg-xl in lossless mode.

>>107704398
I want to sneak into Hakurei shrine at night and cum into the donation box

>>107704622
>png sometimes completely beats jpeg-xl in lossless mode
This is very rare and occurs mostly in high frequency noise, mostly incompressible images anyway
More realistic performance is closer to this

autumn.png PNG 2560x1440 2560x1440+0+0 8-bit sRGB 6.2156MiB 0.002u 0:00.001
autumn_d0_e7.jxl JXL 2560x1440 2560x1440+0+0 8-bit sRGB 3.37678MiB 0.015u 0:00.014
autumn_d0_e10.jxl JXL 2560x1440 2560x1440+0+0 8-bit sRGB 3.27043MiB 0.001u 0:00.000

>>107704903
It's not unrealistic, the reality is maximum compression requires trying all good file formats in all possible lossless modes with all available filters.

>>107704398
R

File: 1766046463072209.png (51 KB, 500x283)

51 KB PNG

>>107705171
I admire the idea but you don't do this, no one does.

>>107705362
I know a guy who does.