i always hear retards crying about muh resolution but all movies are 1080p on blu ray and every retard knows that bit rate is all that matters
I have a 27" 1080p next to my 32" 4k. it's fine
>>107706543go buy one then instead of seeking approval
>>107706543HOH PI NO WONG MI SOOO HORNYYY
>>107706543If you move your head forward at all, you will see the individual pixels.
Quite the opposite, I think that you should buy it just so you make a bad purchase. Please, just buy it.
720p is adequate. DVD quality is adequate.
>>107707069how will i ever recover spending 100ei guess that is yearly wage in your village ransheed
>>107706543Because the pixels are fuckhuge and look awful to anyone with at least normal vision.
>>107706543It's not enough for a monitor, looks like blurry shit. But if you're using it as a TV, it's fine.
>>107706543It's true that high bit rate 1080p is plenty for video. I have a 4K 32" monitor and 1080p BR rips look great. Good 4K video is better obviously but I'll take good 1080p over bitstarved 4K.>all movies are 1080p on blu rayThis isn't really true. 4K Blu-Rays have been around for nearly 10 years now.>why should not i buy 27 inch 1080p Because at typical monitor viewing distances and assuming typical eyesight, you'll see chunky pixels and text will look like shit.If you're using it as a small budget TV from a further distance then whatever.
