[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/g/ - Technology

Name
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.
  • You may highlight syntax and preserve whitespace by using [code] tags.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


[Advertise on 4chan]


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chatbot_psychosis
>In his editorial published in Schizophrenia Bulletin's November 2023 issue, Danish psychiatrist Søren Dinesen Østergaard proposed a hypothesis that individuals' use of generative artificial intelligence chatbots might trigger delusions in those prone to psychosis. Østergaard revisited it in an August 2025 editorial, noting that he has received numerous emails from chatbot users, their relatives, and journalists, most of which are anecdotal accounts of delusion linked to chatbot use. He also acknowledged the phenomenon's increasing popularity in public engagement and media coverage. Østergaard believed that there is a high possibility for his hypothesis to be true and called for empirical, systematic research on the matter. Nature reported that as of September 2025, there is still little scientific research into this phenomenon.

What's the solution to AI psychosis? /g/ is especially afflicted by this.
>>
Regulation for the use of the tool must be passed. The burden should fall on those hosting it for others.
Anything less will be meaningless, and anything more would hinder competition while entrenching the current shitty corpo-AI providers.
>>
>>107709551
>Regulation for the use of the tool must be passed. The burden should fall on those hosting it for others.
What kind of regulation is going to protect dumb people from thinking there's a magical sentient genie in their machine talking to them?
>>
File: 1767019825996.png (1.13 MB, 1024x1024)
1.13 MB
1.13 MB PNG
>
>>
>>107709529
>retarded people are affected by fiction
wooooooooww
>>
>>107709529
Why are normals too stupid to use a chatbot without going insane
>>
>>107709827
>normals too stupid to use a chatbot without going insane
That's the entire target audience for LLMs. There is no other use case for it.
>>
>>107709529
I'm not actually convinced chatbots are making people insane who weren't already so. I remember the numbers I think it was openAI published showed a percentage of people who seemed to qualify for "AI psychosis" induced chat behavior that pretty much tracked the amount of people who are shizo in the general population. And if you have hundreds of millions of people using your product, there's bound to be a lot of people that have pyschosis simply by law of large numbers.
>>
>>107709879
>I'm not actually convinced chatbots are making people insane who weren't already so.
Moot point. Most of the population has zero grip on reality.

>the numbers I think it was openAI published...
Stopped reading.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.