Is Yandex the best search engine to use as an America? My primary concern is US government surveillance
>>107717127if it goes overseas, they don't need a warrant
>>107717127youll get on all the lists if you dont do that in private but id say, yeahwestern search engines tend to be """lazy""" with certain queries
>>107717134Not OP but that assumes Russia would hand over US communication data willingly to the US. Are you claiming they do that or are willing to do that?
>>107717145a wiretap warrant, retard
>My primary concern is US government surveillanceNow tell me what os and phone you use
>>107717134As though a warrant requirement really stops anything of importance. See: parallel construction.
>>107717147Can you try to expand your thoughts in more than single sentence replies or is that way too much to ask of you? You've created an environment where I have to guess what you're saying due to lack of context and clarification and then calling me a retard when I misunderstand. This seems like a great way for you to feel superior while injecting your inane opinions.
>>107717181hes saying that if you are conducting your business in another country, the procedures US law would have to take to say, spy on your on their own soil, are thrown out the window.now you can say>russia wont comply!but the signals are already recorded and backdoored
>>107717196Ok, thank you! So if you are a habitual user of Yandex for instance, that would give the US the right to wiretap you without a warrant to intercept the communications.>but the signals are already recorded and backdoorAre you saying all https communications are backdoored including TLS3 by the US government, so they are able to intercept and decrypt these transmissions?
>>107717196Trust me bro, I can't stand the behavior of glowniggers any further than the next TAD. But your posts simply come across as kike niggerpilling (((gayops))) if you don't provide more substance to your claims. Please report to your supervisor immediately for more training.
>>107717255if your little pocket device can handle and decrypt the protocol in less than a milisecond, why do you think its strong in any meaningful way?it exists to stop snooping by other consumer facing parties, not anything substantial
>>107717127>as an AmericaWhich continent? North or South?
>>107717255(nta)>t. damage control
>>107717292Your comment is so insanely ignorant I don't even know how to explain this to you in a way you'd understand outside of recommending you start studying encryption methods from ground zero. I hope you look back on your comment in a decade and realize how pants-on-head retarded it was.
>>107717145The Russian government ? No. A Yandex employee or affiliate for a few dollars? YesThis would be a good way to actually get your searches personally looked by an intelligence analyst since less than %1 of searches in the US are with.I can tell you exactly it would. Say there's an advertising company in Kazachstan or whatever the fuck shithole that's not hostile to Russia. And this company is a CIA front. So this company approaches Yandex offering a handsome sum, or employee with a bribe. They tell Yandex they want to advertise to Americans send your data from America to us. And then Russia is not going to bend over backwards protecting American data. Know what the worst thing is? The CIA front wouldn't have to convince or bribe Yandex. Data sharing with affiliates is automated and they can pick the data they want like it's Amazon shopping.I guarantee you this is going on exactly or something very close to it. Use searx
>Which continent? North or South?