SO IT HAPPENED AGAIN. Our response, rustxisters? We said it was safe.
>>107718135http://jlingz.com
>>107718135fuck rust with a fork, then dissolve it in a vat of acid
>>107718144>another critical vulnerability>another>similar to the previous one>previous>previous critical vulnerabilitylol. lmao.
>>107718160>another critical vulnerability>another>similar to the previous one>previousjust as expected, rust turns into a supply chain attack bonanzabc how else to interpret recurring errors that all provide the same """unintended functionality"""?what are the odds of that?