>NERD is built for machines, not people>LLMs write it, LLVM compiles it, humans only audit>no symbols, braces, or punctuation — just words>each word maps cleanly to a single token>50–70% fewer tokens for the same logic>lower cost, faster generation, same native outputhttps://github.com/Nerd-Lang/nerd-lang-core
>>107729524>No training data>LLMs aren't trained on it>Which means the output will suck>Which means no one will use it>Which means it's dead on arrivalsuch a retarded idea shouldn't have passed the imagination stage
>>107729524It hasn't been written for humans already, it's written for money.
>>107729555yeah, you'd need to write a whatever-to-nerd transpiler, check its validity, transpile many large projects to nerd and somehow get all companies to train on that.Also bad name, looks like it would be a pain to look it up like how looking up rust stuff sometimes brings up the game so you have to add "* programming language" at the end of everything
if LLMs are in charge of the code then why are we bother with high level representation like this at all? just output assembly for fucks sake
NERD exposes the inherent flaw of the LLM. That is of course the quantitative scale of transformer self-attention, O(n2), causing a major bottleneck and forcing engineers to pursue wild goose chases such as trying to code golf their prompts because expanding the context window isn't feasible in spite of throwing massive resources at it.
>>107729819I mean rate of scaling, but who cares. You PDF files understand less than a jeet when it comes to sp-called artificial intelligence. I'll wait another five years for you to catch up.
Maybe the example code is too simplistic, but I this seems like a pointless exercise. There's nothing about it that makes it particularly difficult to read and write for humans. I kind of like it, even.
>>107729524buy an ad you shitskin
>>107729524This is more human-friendly than C-like syntax.
>slop-langdropped
>>107729524It's babies first custom programming language, except optimized for tokens.
