I humbly ask for the guy who posted this picture in the last days...If there's a version of 4chanXT that handles JXL file conversion as I could not implement it myself..Thanks..
>>107738356That was me. It doesn't have anything to do with the extension but your browser. Try librewolf and enable jxl in about:config
>>107738497So 4chanXT supports JXL out of the box then?Ok.. I guess I'll have to wait for Chromium to support it.I was trying to implement in the script external jxl decoders in js.
>>107738537You could try building chrome with jxl-rs and calling it somehow.
>>107738497Huh. Why is it disabled in the first place
>>107738618It's experimental support that wasn't completed, using reference jxl libraries.
>>107738673>>107738618Chromium is gatekeeping the JXL support. They started implementing it then cut it off.Recently the interest cam eback and should come in 2026.So Chromium fags need to wait.
>>107738586>You could try building chromethis is a non-starter and you know itwho is going to build chrome? you have 128gb+ of ram?
>>107738618>Huh. Why is it disabled in the first placeWhy the FUCK are you on /g/ at all?Google HATES (capital H) JXL. They went all in with WEBP.https://mjtsai.com/blog/2025/06/17/chrome-doesnt-support-jpeg-xl/Only after 4chan refusing to support it, they are no reconsider adding support to Chrom*.
>>107738618Because it's a complex format and browsers don't want another CVE that breaks everything.
>>107739128>>107739200Daiz is here, abandon ship
>>107739128>they are now reconsider adding support to Chrom*.>>107739200yet they added avif/webp/webm/vp9/av1/av2 approximately five seconds after finishing the spec drafts causing multiple CVEs
