I run my Ryzen 5 5600 at a max boost clock of 4ghz with a voltage offset so significant that my CPU never hits more than .975v under any circumstance, i've never seen it exceed 55c ever.
Is it slower than stock? Yes. Is it comfy? Hell yeh...
I felt bad about running my 5700X at 4.85 GHz for hours so I turned off extended frequency. The voltage levels stay much more reasonable.
>>107769348Yea, the X chips in particular really crank the voltage to push the single core. I've heard they basically kill themselves or in the very least degrade over time. Undervolting these cutting the power draw and temps by like 40% at the cost of 5% performance is worth it for me
>>107769357Yes I've diagnosed a degraded 5800X on this very board.
>>107769419Message board that is, not motherboard.
you should check for ram errors with prime95 and such
>>107769293>“Bro I undervolted so hard my PC will last 20 years instead of 15” lol lmao even
>>107769568Do you really behave like this
>>107769293I run my 9950X3D at stock frequency without fucking around with voltages. I've never seen it exceed 85c ever.
>>107769429Image board that is, not keyboard.
>>107769348I turned off boost clock override not perfomance boost overdrivefunny words
>>107769293i'm actually thinking about it for my 5950x. This shit constantly overclock itself too aggressively.
>>107770386will probably do it better than my 5600 desu, do it, it's comfy. I am using a negative clock offset and negative voltage offset. Not fixed multipliers.
