[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/g/ - Technology


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: maxresdefault.jpg (102 KB, 1280x720)
102 KB
102 KB JPG
https://www.nvidia.com/en-us/geforce/news/dlss-4-5-geforce-game-ready-driver/
https://www.nvidia.com/en-us/drivers/details/260405/
>>
>>107779109
can't wait to try it out when I'll buy a new flaming hot 3060 for 3000$ in some months
>>
File: 1751294059651512.gif (2.81 MB, 498x374)
2.81 MB
2.81 MB GIF
>>107779109
>minimal (almost unnoticeable) image quality upgrade for more VRAM usage and less FPS.
>>
Enjoy your CuckDNA fags. LOL
>>
File: 1738112956961229.png (101 KB, 574x540)
101 KB
101 KB PNG
>>107779109
Who's tested Preset M (DLSS 4.5 SR) and how is the performance compared to Preset K? I'm hearing as much as 20% worse performance in games...
>>
5070 TI: 4090 performance!
>>
>>107779109
can I cap framegen at 60? Like, I have 40-50, I turn it on and I get a solid 60? I game at 1080p and 60 or 75 is sufficient. Going from 30 to 60 with framegen is a weird experience to put it simply.
>>
>>107779109
Dear Lord, if I looked like that guy I'd cry in shame and never leave the house. That is the stupidest hair style I've ever seen. Are his friends / coworkers / family afraid to inform him how stupid he looks? Man, even the legit retarded people at the mall would make fun of him.
>>
>6x frame gen only works on 50 series
So my 4090 which I bought in 2023 is already outdated. This is the most jewish company on the fucking planet.
>>
File: 1731643229426288.jpg (54 KB, 976x850)
54 KB
54 KB JPG
I just updated and I don't see new presets (M/K/L). Running a 4080.
>>
>>107780182
The 4090 is almost 2 1/2 times the price of a 5070Ti and has only 20% more performance. The 5080 is almost identical in specs to the 4090 and is still $600 USD cheaper.
>>
>>107782935
https://github.com/beeradmoore/dlss-swapper/releases
>>
>>107779109
>an RTX 5060 is now equivalent to the RTX 3080 and can run Cyberpunk with full Path Tracing
Bravo Jensen
>>
>>107782882
If it makes you feel better DLSS doesn't work on my 9070xt either.
>>
File: file.png (53 KB, 1751x595)
53 KB
53 KB PNG
is this enough to make the 4.5 thing work?
Or do you need to have like verified game with verified support on top?
>>
>>107779618
Why would you lie?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UmA6T3ZLcAM
>>
>>107782935
>>107783150
DLSS.Updater is better
>>
>>107782935
Latest is Preset M (or L if older then 40 series).
Preset K is old DLSS 4.0 not 4.5.

No need for 3rd party tools. Test with DLSS UI overlay.
>>
File: radio frog.jpg (12 KB, 400x199)
12 KB
12 KB JPG
Her green plastic fake frames
For her fake Chinese fake game
In a fake plastic Earth
>>
>>107783150
>>107784984
>>107785090
Apparently I had to enable the beta versions of the njudea app and install the latest because the options wouldn't show up despite the driver being updated.
>>
File: crop.png (36 KB, 263x60)
36 KB
36 KB PNG
>>107785119
I didn't, just normal driver update and select "Latest". Preset M automatically selected.
There's really no need to tweak that shit like we had to in the past.
>>
File: profiled.png (148 KB, 945x1320)
148 KB
148 KB PNG
>>107785119
I didn't have to do that. I don't even have the Nvidia "App" installed, nor any retarded program just for managing DLSS. Nvidia Profile Inspector is literally all you need to do anything with the Nvidia drivers.
>>
>>107785207
what kinda fucking retard doesnt install nvidia app but does go out of his way to finds some "nvidia profiler inspector" spyware instead
>>
>>107785223
The kind of tech-illiterate retards like yourself that inhabit this board now are truly fascinating. You reminded me of this screenshot from the other day featuring similarly-minded Discord zoomers.
>>
>>107785268
kill yourself
>>
>>107785279
You first, ESL monkey.
>>
File: file.png (2.46 MB, 1222x1059)
2.46 MB
2.46 MB PNG
>>107779750
>as much as 20% worse
only if you're a poorfag on 3000 and 4000 series
in MH Wilds i only lost like 5fps but at Quality it looks fucking ridiculous
my day is a bit brighter now
>>
>>107785223
>>107785279
>nvidia user
>doesn't use nvidia profile inspector
retard tech illiterate consumer
>>
File: 1757573934028760.gif (3.11 MB, 498x498)
3.11 MB
3.11 MB GIF
>>107779750
>>107785328
I have a 4080S and with preset M I get 71 FPS while with preset K I get 68 FPS.
Quality wise I can't tell them apart, so I'd say it's a win, free performance.
>>
so it's just updated frame gen? no thanks
>>
>>107785471
Why do you post before even reading thread?
>>
File: 1767729181689.jpg (63 KB, 433x395)
63 KB
63 KB JPG
Let's see how my 3050Ti laptop handles DLSS 4.5, apparently I now have to go for preset K only
>>
>>107785698
Here's the article where I read about it

https://videocardz.com/newz/nvidia-dlss-4-5-costs-2-3-performance-on-rtx-50-rtx-20-30-may-be-hit-with-20-drops
>>
Nevermind, I'm retarded
>>
File: g9q7QM5KH2vKcorscHULj7.jpg (113 KB, 1280x720)
113 KB
113 KB JPG
>>107779109
https://youtu.be/Mdco4MDDqw8

Niggervidia is not gaming company anymore
>>
>>107785223
bro your "nvidia app" makes like 5 outgoing connections every single second
but totally not spyware amirite ;)
>>
File: dlss4.5.png (6 KB, 423x206)
6 KB
6 KB PNG
>>107785431
make sure you're not in placebo mode anon, it will always reduce fps specially below 5000 series
check your Nvidia app and opt in for Beta features, it will only work is app is version 11.0.6 yadayada
then force DLSS Override Latest on Global Settings or by individual Program and that's what enables it fully
>>107785698
compare K to L Performance and decide by yourself, apparently L is a huge step forward too
>>
>I like to be raped with 10 inch (diameter) dildo
>Poorfag, you should buy new 11 inch RTX_Black dildo
Why are nvidia fags like this?
>>
>>107786046
>make sure you're not in placebo mode anon
I use DLSS overlay. See >>107785188

I ran several benchmarks. 68 vs 71 isn't error rate.
>>
File: 1740941311152680.png (95 KB, 837x1084)
95 KB
95 KB PNG
>>107786069
AMD fag mad that Nvidia tards get free goodies.
>>
File: compressed-image.jpg (3.57 MB, 1920x1080)
3.57 MB
3.57 MB JPG
>>107786046
>compare K to L Performance and decide by yourself, apparently L is a huge step forward too
haha it fucking murders my fps

Shadow of the Tomb Raider

DLSS 4.5 Preset K
>>
File: compressed-image (1).jpg (3.88 MB, 1920x1080)
3.88 MB
3.88 MB JPG
>>107786225
DLSS 4.5 Preset L
>>
>be me
>poorfag
>it will be supported in 30 series
>3050
>only up to Preset K
T-thanks NVIDIA...
>>
File: Screenshot (212).png (279 KB, 1920x1080)
279 KB
279 KB PNG
>>107786244
I recommend DLSS Swapper
>>
>>107786046
>>107786225
>>107786239
What the fuck are you faggots doing.
L is for Ultra Performance for a reason, it's the heaviest model, it has to upscale a tiny resolution, the performance benefit comes from that. Using it with Quality is just extra strain.
Same for M but it isn't as heavy and mainly for Performance. Even though it works better with other modes like Quality too.

K is still the lightest model but doesn't benefit from the new transformer model.
>>
>>107786244
Update Nvidia App to beta, officially it comes out in 13th Jan I think.

>>107786261
DLSS Swapper or Updater works, or I actually recommend Nvidia Profile Inspector.

You don't need either though, if you just update to yesterdays driver and set to "Latest", it will force Preset M.
There's a lot of confusing, conflicting and false information.
>>
>>107786288
>L is for Ultra Performance for a reason, it's the heaviest model, it has to upscale a tiny resolution
At 1080p native, DLSS ultra performance would be like 480p or something

Let me give it a try
>>
>>107786357
Watch this.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_gQ202CFKzA
>>
File: compressed-image (2).jpg (3.56 MB, 1920x1080)
3.56 MB
3.56 MB JPG
>>107786357
hahaha 360p

Not worth it
>>
>>107786239
damn son you can't deny it looks fkn amazing in comparison, but you can't expect better with a 3000 series laptop srry about that
>>
>>107786466
Not expecting magic

DLSS 4.5 was clearly aimed at 50 series GPUs and high end 40 series
>>
>>107785328
>4.5 Super Res uses FP8 precision, accelerated on RTX 40 and 50 series
According to NVIDIA Preset M is better optimized for 40 series and 50 series but by the looks of it DLSS 4.5 SR appears to double down on both temporal stability and also performance cost.
>>
File: 1741768714987654.jpg (57 KB, 600x800)
57 KB
57 KB JPG
>more fake frames
>>
>>107786696
it 100% will have a performance cost, now this is just my experience but my performance hit at 4k/5070ti was negligible and even less important with Frame Gen on
the upscaling quality tho is night and day, do i care if i'm playing at 165fps vs 175fps because of that? not really
>>
>>107785090
>>107785119
>>107785188
>>107785207
>Nvidia Profile Inspector is literally all you need to do anything with the Nvidia drivers.
This. After downloading the new DLL via DLSS Swapper and ensuring the preset is set to "Latest" via inspector I do see Preset M according to "Render Preset" using DLSS UI Hud. But this is all with driver 581.57, not the latest 591.74. Can anyone confirm that DLSS 4.5 SR (Preset M, L) works as intended on older drivers prior to 591.74?
>>
>>107786698
do intel/amdrones actually think we are talking about FG?
>>
>>107787079
The SOTTR screenshots I provided were with this driver
>>
>>107787191
Thanks anon. It appears DLSS 4.5 SR does work with older drivers that support DLSS 4 SR.
>>
File: IMG_0568.jpg (14 KB, 335x597)
14 KB
14 KB JPG
>>107782132
>t.
>>
>>107787297
So upon testing DLSS 4.5 SR Preset M and comparing it to DLSS 4 SR Preset K both in "Performance" Quality Preset on Red Dead Redemption 2, Preset M seems a bit less sharp when compared to Preset K. Has anyone else noticed this?
>>
File: 1761536970041320.png (25 KB, 275x68)
25 KB
25 KB PNG
>>107784974
i still dont see a difference, also nice frame pacing kek.
>buy an ad
>>
>>107785328
How's the visual upgrade? DLSS 4 transformer was already ridiculously good compared to DLSS 3, I don't know if 4.5 can even look that much better.
>>
File: 1751213561166360.png (3.97 MB, 2560x1440)
3.97 MB
3.97 MB PNG
>>107786698
DLSS upscaling at 50% became better than native like a year ago, unc
>>
>>107791676
As long as it doesn't smear shit all over the place. SR is easy when the camera doesn't move and there's no depth&shadow complexity.
>>
>>107791747
The screenshot is in motion. TAA blur in motion is fixed. Some occlusion artifacts got worse, but I've never noticed them much. The new model again claims to have fixed that, but 3rd party tests will tell.
>>
File: tux spin.gif (1.03 MB, 512x512)
1.03 MB
1.03 MB GIF
>>107785347
I can barely take Nvidia users seriously online anymore.
Every time they talk about their drivers or updates or whatever I’ll always know they’re stuck on that kernel panicking stutterfest jeetOS coded in Reactjs.
And they pay thousands of dollars to do so.
>>
>>107789312
imagine thinking they need ads to sell their gaming gpu lmao
>>
>>107791825
Sounds like user error since I have zero issues.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.