What does /g/ think about generating 6 fake frames for every real frame?Your GPU just needs to render at 9FPS for you to be able to get above a full playable 60FPS.
>>107781802It adds latency when you were already at high latency anyways. Redundant technology. You need the GPU power for high performance and there's no way around it
>>107781802Frame generation is only for rich people. You need 60fps base. Fucking idiot
>>107781802Consoomers only care about FPS.So NVIDIA gave them more FPS.I think it's horseshit but if I know gamers, gamers will eat that shit up and ask for more until they are seeing '480 FPS' in a game on their 60 Hz monitor.
>>107781802>Your GPU just needs to render at 9FPS for you to be able to get above a full playable 60FPS.Math?
>>1077818021000/9=111ms latencyWhat could possibly go wrong
>>107782488This is clearly targeted for >60hz displays. With traditional polygon+shader pipelines, there is no way we will ever see the dream of 1000hz without framegen.
>>107782892Obviously, this doesn't change the game logic framerate.
>be me >poorfag>it will be supported in 30 series>3050>only up to Preset KT-thanks NVIDIA
>>107783622With latency that bad you need to start predicting user input like they're playing across the Atlantic.
