>>107788432
Every aifaggot believes they're being more productive than they really are, it's induced mass delusions of grandeur coupled with cope about how they're on the bleeding turd edge of technology

>>107788432
I know exactly which server you're in and who that is.
He's a nuisance posted Ray won't kick for some reason.

>>107788432
People are paying control for premium nowadays
I do technical 3D explainer animations
Every client i got in last 2 years came crawling and was fondling my balls while working, people dont want shit fast, they want it predictable, precise and exactly no left or right from their idea.

>>107788739
Nah, the delusion is all yours. I know very well when I'm less productive, and when I'm more productive.

Overall it probably doesn't speed you up, but it does make development more fun and easy. You get to alt+tab all the time.

>>107789026
No I don't think I'd trust an aijeet's opinion on it's own skill level. The more you use it the dumber you get, keep proompting and losing neurons you smoothbrained faggot.

>>107788739
Cope
>inb4 pajeet
whiter than you ameirmutt

>>107789141
>America lives rent free in the poopskins brain

File: IMG_1208.png (167 KB, 1301x889)

167 KB PNG

>>107789026

lmao
no you don’t
software engineering productivity is notoriously hard to measure
engineers are terrible at measuring it themselves
you’re at the peak of mount stupid

File: s.png (237 KB, 1410x555)

237 KB PNG

>>107789026
>t.

>>107789026
I have no idea whether I am being more or less productive when I turn to AI vs googling and just thinking about whatever I need to accomplish.

>>107789254
Ainiggercope is really insufferable

>>107789254
>just pastes links in with all the tracking elements
this is the most blatant AI jeet in history.

>>107789258
use google ai overview, it's very good saar

why are PEOPLE still required to have involvement with "AI" like prompts or any kind of interface whatsoever???
take software for example, what is the goal? to make money? shouldn't this junk work like a GENIE by now?
only one time do you ever have to just click a button that automatically types out a prompt that does ALL the magical work to make you a fortune.

instead, people are using this thing to try and solve specific problems. pointless! let the AI genie figure out what is best to make you a trillionaire by tomorrow.
if it can't do it then that is proof that AI is FAKE

btw this post was written by a real person and I am a real person.
i hope this knowledge give you goosebumps. thinking about real people and real human connection is so scarce these days.

File: now you see me.png (91 KB, 1368x1438)

91 KB PNG

>>107788432
Yeah bro AI is great, but its only great for coding.

File: now you dont.png (95 KB, 1383x2041)

95 KB PNG

>>107790405
Our north star is 1 developer, 1 month, 1 millions lines of code.

File: abell46s-reface.mp4 (108 KB, 498x498)

108 KB MP4

>>107790420
We are beginning to distinguish between 'spectacle' and 'substance'. We now have a clearer sense of where the tech is headed

>>107788739
you're a midwit 99 iq schizo suffering from grandiosity

>>107790463
Thanks for sharing your perspective. I understand that you might see things that way, and I’m okay with differing opinions. I’m focused on staying grounded and taking things one step at a time.

Horse and buggy users crying about automobiles.

>>107789254
>uses the Lord's name in vain flippantly
>is stupid
Checks out

>>107788432
It increased my productivity vut it is just cause I use it as a search engine. It is still not even close to the pre-jeetified Google from 10 years ago but better that current Google and Bing.

>>107789254
>the ChatGPT-drone is also an Amazon-drone
Of course...

>>107789254
>i didn't copy paste, i copied it by hand!

>dont write essay
>use AI to write essay

Which one is more productive?

>>107790627
>AI generated response
lol

>>107789254

>this is the guy replacing you sometime in the next 5 years

>>107788432
AI is really dangerous if you don't know more about the subject than it does. AI psychosis also exists in the technical sense where you can get it to convince you that everything is wrong and broken except your (and its) fundamental understanding of the subject matter is incorrect. DO NOT USE AI AS A TEACHER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! IT IS AN ASSISTANT.

Take this list, extract all the words in quotes, list them vertically and add a comma after each one

AI is very useful

>>107790447
t. Microslop

the discord zoomer "christians" are consistently the most retarded humans
anyone with a bible verse in bio is guaranteed to be room temp iq

>>107792989
list.txt

alpha "bravo" charlie "delta"
"echo" foxtrot golf
hotel india "juliet" kilo
"lima" "mike" november
oscar "papa"
quebec romeo sierra
"tango"
uniform "victor" whiskey "xray" yankee
zulu

awk -F'"' '{ for (i=2; i<=NF; i+=2) print $i "," }' list.txt

took me less than two minutes to write this shit included the hand-written list, works offline on any machine with a shell and awk installed, does not leak anything to any globohomos, do not burn an entire forest when you hit enter, can be included into a script for future automated parsing.

parsing text is a solved problem in the unix/linux world since basically the late-70s when awk, sed and grep were invented.

>inb4 b-b-b-but I need to parse .docx for my shitty suicide-inducing corpojob

pandoc list.docx -t plain | awk -F'"' '{ for (i=2; i<=NF; i+=2) print $i "," }'

right there you fucking mong, you don't need any genslop to parse fucking files in 2k26. no wonder retards of your kind are getting replaced by chatbots, you have 0 knowledge, you don't belong in front of a text editor in the first place.

>>107788432
what's the point of learning something if you tell some slave (AI) to do the thing for you? You might get or not the results, but you won't learn much from it, unless after you are done maybe make the same thing from scratch without help.

>>107788432
>>107788739
it's useful if you already know what you're doing

>>107793149
unix power tools and AWK were worth reading
it was fucking long time ago, but what was learned is retained
but perl is better, regex with capture groups can solve more complex patterns and still can be written as one liner
but for trivial examples awk is good

>>107788432
It does increase productivity to a certain extent. The problem (for retards in the pic especially) is that to take full advantage of it, you already need to have knowledge and skills to both know when to use it to best effect and to be able to tell when it gets stuck and starts feeding you bullshit.

>>107789254
Don't be so hard on Jeetsus, he's 2000 years old

>>107788432
>programming minecraft in javascript
what

>>107788432
>studies have repeatedly shown that cogsuckers routinely take 10-20% longer to debug/fix ai generated slop code vs people who just fucking write the damn shit

>>107792989
Nope, decided to change the comma to question marks randomly. Ai does this whenever there is a large document in hope you won't notice the hallucinations.

>>107789254
this blud isn't even 20 years old, let alone have "20 years under his belt"
>I programmed it all
lmao

>>107789258
LLMs save way more time for providing a dynamic solution to a speciic problem as opposed to hoping you find a similar problem and a static solution that you then have to spend time on making it fit your solution

>>107793208
It's really not. It can be useful as an autocomplete but even then you have to recheck it.

>>107790322
>why are PEOPLE still required to have involvement with "AI" like prompts or any kind of interface whatsoever???
>take software for example, what is the goal? to make money? shouldn't this junk work like a GENIE by now?
>only one time do you ever have to just click a button that automatically types out a prompt that does ALL the magical work to make you a fortune.
>
>instead, people are using this thing to try and solve specific problems. pointless! let the AI genie figure out what is best to make you a trillionaire by tomorrow.
>if it can't do it then that is proof that AI is FAKE
Because the output shits the bed after a certain threshold but it can be useful before hitting the limit where it shits the bed

>>107793265
yeah, whenever i have to use something more advanced than print in awk, i find i'm probably better off doing something in perl or python. or sed, honestly

>>107794295
>It can be useful as an autocomplete but even then you have to recheck it.
yeh but it works as a "big" autocomplete.
for example, just building quickly then refactoring as you go makes for tedious refactors, but it's also nice to just start building. I find that if you don't give them too massive of a job at once it can handle a lot of that kind of tedious stuff just fine, and the benefit (to me) to just crackin' at it without white boarding or trying to clean code all over the place from the beginning is that I tend to benefit from thinking about how to architect the whole thing while actually working on it.
imo a single dev can just get a lot more done if you know how to intelligently "pair program" with an LLM

>>107793208
I had cases where AI was a huge waste of time because it led me off track.
I had cases where AI was useful to get the overall concept of how something works. Like when you don't know how something should be done by spec, AI does usually get that right. As long as you have a way to later check if the AI didn't hallucinate, of course.

In any way, AI isnt much of a productivity increase, even when you know how things work and can check it.

>>107795433
well don't let it lead you

>>107792898
He typed it all with his keyboard, you stupid luddite.

>>107792978
People now type prompts that clearly include their preconceived opinions into chatbots and use whatever it spits out as evidence in arguments now. Which means this is their go-to method for cursory research. They are typing "explain why [thing I believe that is not really correct]" and read the chatbot's affirming answer thinking they've been vindicated.
Another person with the completely opposite opinion asks a question and gets their belief validated as well. Now two people live in diverging realities convinced they're correct. Emotionally, it's affirmation that they probably don't have IRL, so they won't verify against whatever sources it spits out and simply consider the chatbot output an authority. It makes verifying results inherently unpalatable for these people. So the chatbot begins to define what they think through this manipulation, building bespoke realities for different people based on things they already wanted to be true.

>>107795457
>tell AI to do something
>AI does it
>look at the code
>looks fine, but one extra condition or check that looks unneccessary
>ask it why it did that thing
>it hallucinates some shit about how blablabla has to be done
>pressure it on it
>it now produces even more code for that unneccessary thing
>check documentations, spec, whatever... conclude that you dont need it, tell the AI that docs says you dont need it
>OH WOW, YOU ARE THE SMARTEST PERSON ALIVE, OF COURSE YOU ARE RIGHT AND I WAS WRONG, I APOLOGIZE

>>107795925
Seeing people use Google AI results or grok as proof in an argument is the most dystopian shit post-CoViD.
It becomes even worse when you want to save those lost souls and tell them not to use AI validation as proof. Then you are in an argument with them about whether or not AI is useful and they will go on full denial.
>look, here an example of this AI telling people to eat glue
<NONONO, IT CAN NOT BE! Its a different AI now, its much better now!

File: claude.jpg (103 KB, 1080x659)

103 KB JPG

>>107796569
well don't "pressure" it or even ask it for justification if you know what you're doing, just say "that looks good except x let's leave that out for now"

>>107796999
I made my mistakes. I made erros, I typed it wrong. But you know what? I used grok, chatgpt, I used phind to tell me why I get errors

>>107789068
I use it when I am really procrastinating at something so I ask it to generate basic stubbed out code for me to fill up, I really hate doing all that gruntwork like writing class headers or config files so I can focus on the thinking part while AI writes the dumb code.

>>107797016
I am error.

>>107788432
> opengl state machine filters ai
nice. I had the same experience with implementing fenics sims its fucking sucks but is 100% convinced that it works.

>>107796642
this sorta reminds me after getting a bit older i stopped talking to a friend because i couldn't tell whether i was messaging; talking to him or his "partner."
in recent times id think a similar thought, am i talking to a friend or an ai machine because its use seems ubiquitous and accepted among most friends.
id say in both cases it is a worthless endeavour to chat in such conditions

>>107796642
>see 4chan argument
>one anon has a based opinion and the other is gay
>the based one uses an AI summary as proof
>have to side with the fag anon on principle

>>107800211
>muh side
critical thinking of a five-year-old

>>107792978
Conversely, I think it is good to sometimes ask it about stuff you do know well. You can see things that
>it knows that you also know
>it can suggest that you didn't immediately think about, or know about
>it speaks confidently about but are basically just avoiding basic rookie mistakes
>it has strange obsessions about but are not actually very relevant
Then try to imagine just following its advice about a topic without the prelearned filter, how much time or effort would you spend on some nonsense