The AIs are making extremely confident claims that my business and the domain name it's served on is a criminal enterprise, and I have to argue with it and point out the lack of evidence for 4-5 rounds before it admits it was wrong.The source of the problem is that the domain is a generic word (let's say cars.com) and the criminal enterprise (which once did exist) called itself, let's say, Cars Collective. But again, no connection to my domain name at all beyond the partial word match.It's gotta be costing me a lot of money. Traffic from Google has dropped hundredfolds to now 0-2 clicks a day.What would you do in this situation? If I start ranting about the problem on the About page it could be offputting or scary to potential customers.
>>107795518rebrandits pretty much the only thing you can doand you dont get rid of the old domain, you show a landing page saying "we are now xyz, you will be redirected in 5 seconds, or click link here"bc what are the alternatives?sue google + perplexity + openai ...?
To make the whole situation even dumber, the crime group had their own domain name, carscollective.com per my example. The AIs are citing this as direct evidence that "CARS.COM" is the crime group. The sources linked have no references to cars.com at all, only carscollective.com.>>107795550I've spent years on this and it's a premium domain. Holding out some faint hope that maybe someone with a bone to pick with AI or google or something will write about the case and get the problem fixed. Suing megacorporations isn't really an option.
>>107795691sorry to hear that anonthis is bad>someone to hear about itmaybe try to make some noise on social media?
I didn't read the post, but the title of book you posted contains what is called a "SLIPPERY SLOPE FALACY!", sorry!
>>107795518blud released a book in the big 2026
>>107795691I am way too poor to have any decent domain so I am glad you spent a lot of money on a richfag domain and got cucked by Google.
>>107795792your generation is completely dysfunctional
>>107795518find an attorney to sue for libel. I am sure some attorney that hates AI would love to do this for free.
>>107795518Why not just sue Google?Lol, sounds preposterous, but it's this exactly the kind of shit defamation lawsuits are meant to take care of?If you even want to consider this option, save images of everything the AI is doing, cause they'll simply delete everything later.Who knows, maybe a simple decease and desist is enough to force them to correct their mistakes.
>>107795903(not op)this is a long shot but this could work.heres how i see things:op makes noise on social mediaan attorney whos angry at aishit chimes inlets say you do 50/50 on the damagesgoogle will either cease and diseaseor they will settlesocial media publicity will also play a role here because your silence will be worth moreop + lawyer are 1M richer, eachgoogle spends more on their toilet paper, monthly so from their perspective they dodged a bulletand everyone lived happily thereafter
>>107796269>google spends more on their toilet paper, monthly so from their perspective they dodged a bulletgoogle spends more on their toilet paper, monthly so from their perspective they dodged a bullet in exchange for peanuts and a handshake
>>107796269I'm considering it, but weighing it with the fact that damages can't be proven to be very high (biz is a couple years old), and I'm european, and I don't like drama or meetings or social media.
>>107796338i completely understand iti probably wouldnt have done all that eitheri would prolly go with my first recommendation: just rebrandbut if thats not an option, what i outlined above seems to be a viable alternativeand the social media think is a key element in how i see things-theres the dimension of how much you can damage google's brandits gonna motivate them to settleand then theyre not paying for damages, theyre paying you to keep silent, theyre paying to protect their brandthe calculation is:how much are they gonna lose if you do anti-advertising for them vs how much would it cost to make you happy and move on with your lifeif they go to court, yeah sure the judge is gonna fine them 50k instead of a couple milliesbut they have been judged and deemed guilty. theres no two ways about the facts, because these has been established by a judge50k is not gonna make you happyand so youre gonna damage their brand as badly as you can. also legal costs etcsettling is the rational option. but that hinges on a decent social media presence, a free lawyer, and it is quite some hassle
>>107796469I just realized I can ask Josh from KF for advice. He has dealt with US lawyers from Europe for years, and he hates Google so he'll probably reply. Thanks!
>>107796564happy to help. godspeed.
>>107795760get back to the trenches ivan you're supposed to die in a foxhole from ukrainian drone fire lol
>>107795518>tech sector memed itself into thinking computers could never make a mistake>Partially because they were running really simple code on something that literally only runs code bare metal, unlike humans who have to run it through 10+ filters before they start calculating>Partially because tech bros are the same slack jawed consumerists morons as the rest of the lower class and incestuously gobbled up sci-fi slop who got all their stories by reading popular science magazines.>Now we're scaling up computers and forcing math into faux pattern recognition and thinking "well it can do 2+2 so why can't it tell a murder from a public indecency case?"
>>107795518Not reading the thread beyond the op. Good job posting here, now start posting this shit on reddit so all the AIs can "learn" it.
>>107800407AI is beginning to learn from itself by being trained on slop.
>>107795518Sue
>>107795903>Lol, sounds preposterous, but it's this exactly the kind of shit defamation lawsuits are meant to take care of?No. First problem is actually finding out who to sue. You can't sue the AI since it's not a person. The second is proving intent. Was the party you're sueing intentionally trying to cause damages? Then you actually have to prove damages. Can you equate loss of business/revenue DIRECTLY to the AI having incorrect data. Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act (1996) give a lot of protections to websites (even websites like 4chan which is good). But it makes sueing them for content posted on their sites nearly impossible unless they were posting it themselves. If someone posted something defamatory on 4chan for example the victim wouldn't be able to sue Moot.
>>107795518cool larp
>>107795813Nah bro I'm pretty sure the peeps who can't into a video editor are the dysfunctional ones. Getting a PhD is the equivalent of paying a company to train you in MS DOS operation for 10 years except the year is 2126
>>107795691Lol rich retard. Hope they steal everything from you.
>>107804752It's just a random noun, I don't own cars.com. Got mine for $5k 15+ years ago and I honestly should have just put it in s&p500 instead
>>107804357written word is best to express complex ideas because you can re-read the phrase youre readingmonetization-wise it doesnt compare, its not even closeand good luck censoring a book or a pamphletyoure inferior in every metric, weaker in the head, and weaker in the bodyand youre so retarded youre proud of your handicap and laziness
>>107804977Language is what transmits complex ideas, not text, the only thing text has going for it is that it's space efficient>you can re-readYou can re-watch. duh. Text can't even explain simple ideas like to dunk a basketball. Text only gives the illusion of explaining complex concepts. You are a midwit if you fall for it. Programming languages are specific languages to translate relatively simple ideas into machine instructructions, much simpler ideas than what midwits are trying to vaguely gesture at with language. Look at your post, all text, no substance.
>>107805066you never worked with anything complex in your life.imagine a python manual in the form of a an audiobookyoure absolutely ignorant
>>107805066>>107805079btwi mentioned python because im fairly certain you worked with at least that, not because its something *actually* complexnow picture this:you need someone else to connect the dots for youyoure that fucking dysfunctional
>>107804357So zoomers are proud of being illiterate LMAO >nah bruh I ain’t reading no books, that’s cap fr, way too many words n shit
>>107805079>>107805115>python is complicatedlol please tell your elder to cut off your slums' internet access
>>107805137>catastrophic reading comprehension failureimagine getting btfod by 10 lines of textyoure mentally handicapped, theres no two ways about that
>>107805136after>reading books is for whiteswe present to you:>reading books is for uncs
>>107805136>>107805155Reading is literally useless tech. You might as well be proud you can format a floppy disc in less than a minute
>>107805169>>107805167called it.>Reading is literally useless tech.even using a shatbot involves reading you complete unbecile
>>107805155Nobody who knows python (or any programming language) learned it from a book you braindead nigger. >Imagine learning a programming language from writing programming, video tutorials and senior employees, and above all else maintaining your own large scale software projectNobody "learns programming" from books, otherwise there school wouldn't exist
>>107805187>struggles to come up with any use for reading>... chatbots...?LMAO, chatbots are not useful. other than for Braindead unc trying to slurp the ocean
>>107805219>ad populumare these "everbody" in the room with you?also thats not what you use a manual for you drooling retardwhat the fuck are you even doing here? you dont programyoure obviously too retarded to do other types of engineeringwhats your tech-related business here?
>>107805261Get you're antiquated SHITTECH off /g/ unc. Go play with the other geriatric faggots elsewhere.
https://support.google.com/websearch/answer/16011537?sjid=93630711506538213-EU#give_feedbacknow kys
>>107805617>still seething>40 mins laterin a decade ill get sucked by barely legal zoomettes in exchange for reading their bills to themand you will be begging for food on the streets
>>107805671>If I learn to read, surely this will get me laidlol lmao even
>>107805671unc, in 2036, the only barely legals will be alphies born 2018-2020 (depending on jurisdiction), the youngest zoomer will be 24 by then. retarded pedo unc can’t even get his ages right
>>107805709i already know how to read you idiotbut as made obvious itt, you dontand i intend to take full advantage of the fact that the older amongst you already have children. who will be even more deficient than you are
>>107805734>learn2read>mind is warped by brownoid propaganda Nah thanks senpai I'm good.
>>107805721>unc, in 2036, the only barely legals will be alphies born 2018-2020yeah. i know. and?holy fuck youre dumbwhich is all the betterretard chicks fuck best and are easy
>>107805781You have and will never fuck. You are an autistic loser if you read, worse than a speedrunner desu.
>>107805854whatever lets you sleep better zoomzoomfor me, its cumming in a tight hole.keep your cope, ill take the girls thankyouverymuch
