what are your favorite tech grifts? mine is every few years someone tries to invent a "smart gun" like in metal gear solid and then literally not a single person wants to buy it and all the police unions have said they will go on strike if they are mandated on cops and then the company goes bankrupt. I think the only exception was mossberg somehow survived without a bankruptcy but even bigger companies like smith and wesson. The smith and wesson one was hilarious >guy buys smith for $112 million >tries to invent smart guns>boycot>has to sell smith and wesson for $15 million
>>107802423Cops don't need smart guns. Smart guns are for snipers. The point of a smart gun is that it either automatically compensates for bullet drop or even wind or at least it tells you where to aim. But for that it needs wind data and range data which I'm not sure how easy it is to get.
>>107802506that's not a smart gun. "smart guns" are guns with some kind of electronic lock that blocks anyone other than the designated user from firing the gun, see the guns in metal gear solid. so like a fingerprint detector or some kind of RIFD chip
>>107802506>range datasmall cheap laser range finders already exist>wind dataprobably impossible to get in most situations unless you send drones out to measure the wind along the path you want to shoototherwise you can measure the wind at the location of the gun but that's not that accurateeither way you don't need a "smart gun" for that bullshit you just need a "smart scope" but of course that's not such a juicy idea and doesn't make as much profit so Amerimutt corporations won't consider it
>>107802520that's not what a smart gun is, see >>107802518you tranny thirdy retard
>>107802423My favorite tech grift is the part where tech promises "hey goyim, we have a new mommy for you" but that never comes.
>>107802506I think OP is referring stuff like picrel as a smart gun.
