With the current ram crisis Intel needs to restart production of 9th generation CPU's once again on the 14nm process. And it's because 9th gen Intel is the best generation of CPU's that is still compatible with DDR3.Restart the production of 9th gen intel and DDR3 H310 motherboards.
9th gen still feels new to me...
9th gen does not support ddr3. The last gen to do so was 4th gen
>>107804348i agreeand allow overclockingi want to see a 9900K with maxed out DDR3>>107804400it does, OP literally posted a board that supports DDR3 on 9th genlook at intel's official datasheets
>>107804411The CPU doesn’t support ddr3. It doesn’t matter if the board does
>>107804439open widehttps://www.gigabyte.com/Motherboard/H310M-DS2V-DDR3-rev-10/support#Support-Cpu-Supporthttps://www.intel.com/content/dam/www/public/us/en/documents/datasheets/8th-gen-core-family-datasheet-vol-2.pdf
>>107804411>>107804451interdastingthough i wouldnt dare to put an 8-core skylake into one of those 4-phase vrm motherboards for fear of it exploding and killing the chip
>>107804348But seriously imagine if Intel released the i7 8700 and i9 9900 as budget options with DDR3 boards in this ram crisis.
or you can just make more DDR5?
intel even made its own 3d chip during ddr3 era. its called the i5-5675c and i7-5775c bring thise back.
>>107805028They didn't though, it was chiplet based
>>107804393having cpus faster than ivy bridge is weird, i thought we were just going to live in 2016 with shitty dual cores forever
>>107804925Ddr6 is the new ddr5
>>107805312>It's different cause it's over here, and not over there
>>107804348since when do people call them "gens"?it's SKYLAKE or "coffe lake refresh"
>>107806909Since 2011, when the second generation Intel Core iN CPU started to be released on the market.
>>107804925Chinks mass produce ddr3
>>107804393>tfw literally no intel inside...
>>107806745Yes, it is very different you retarded nigger because the entire concept of 3D cache is that it is low latency because it is grafted directly on to the die. How fucking worthless and atupid are you?
>>107804400>>107804439incorrect, 6th through 9th use the same memory controller, and it supports ddr3 and ddr4, intel doesnt " support" the configuration, but it does work10th gen also can support it theoretically ,but no 400 series boards were ever made with ddr3 support
>>107805028its not really the same, its an l4 cache, amd was litterally bonding extra memory to the l3 cache.also the l4 cache on broadwell isnt that great, you can achieve the same result by using faster memory, only really gives you a big bump if your using really slow memory ala ddr3 1066-1333
>>107807188Lol I know that 3d chips are stacked chiplets you goon, thanks for taking the bait tho.
>>107804925AI needs it first
DDR3 is capped at 8GB per stick
>>107807613i remember the L4 benching only about as fast as tuned b-die, roughly 40ns and 60GB/s read/write in aida64
>>107810233And? 16gb and 32gb are the most common amounts of DDR3 people use anyway. All that has to happen is some company starts production of a B365 board with 4 slots of DDR3.
>>107807026No, people said Sandy Bridge. This "gen" business is a recent phenomenon.
>>107804348I'd love to see a mini ITX board like this, as well as one for Kaby Lake. I know there were some 100-series boards that used DDR3 but they only supported Skylake.
>>107810233you can get 16gb per stick, not common but they did make them, there were even 32gb sticks available ,though they were quad rank , and were only intended for 2 dimm boards.
>>107812068>https://winraid.level1techs.com/t/tool-easy-automated-mod-tool-for-coffee-lake-bios/32795all 100 and 200 series boards can unofficially run the 8700k, 9700k, 9900k and 9900ks
