Would it be a good idea if OP could hide posts and other anons if they wanted could opt in and automatically hide those posts for them as well?I think this can be useful for generals so OP can hide the anons who reply just to derail the thread and only one person wastes his time reading the post.
I just use the threaded replies option. If I see some autist reply to another autist and they sperg out on each other, I can easily just scroll by.
>>107808706>>107808675You know what I do since I'm a grown man?Just ignore things I don't likeMy eyes go right pastWowHard!
>>107808675I would never use it because i would never trust an OP to be a moderator.
>>107808675shoudlnt be on here if you can't get used to scrolling past shit you don't like. I've disliked 90% of the users of this website the whole time but I still feel like limiting shitposts would ruin the spirit of the site
>>107808706This works surprisingly well with filters for bait memey words and phrases. I also have nearly 30K frog/sharty jak hashes to go along with it.
>>107808724For normal threads I can agree, but in generals especially smaller ones you have the same posters and usually a couple of anons who bake the threads. After a few threads you can have an idea if you like the thread and if OP cares about it.
>>107808675you need to go back, fuck off
>>107808675No. s4g3
>>107808793go back to rėddit
>>107809205are you mad because want to see less of your shitposts?
