[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/g/ - Technology


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


It seems retarded to work this way. Standards committees take forever to ratify anything C++, Fortran, MPI, etc., then the vendors take even longer to implement the new standards.
Meanwhile, cool stuff like Rust, D, and Python libs are out here making better decisions, quicker.
Who is really benefiting from this slow grind?


MPI 5.0 is the official standard now but vendors are still playing catch up with 4.1. Only 3.1 is officially fully standard compliant.
With C++ it's an even bigger mess
>>
>>107809437
Standards committees is where technology goes to die.
>>
try rust?
>>
>>107809437
People in tech are autistic and rigid
Rigid and autistic people hate change and find comfort in monotony.
>>
C++ is retarded
>>
>>107811969
Some are, some wants to move fast and break things.
>>
>>107812016
It was a generalization. It's mostly accurate.
>>
>>107809437
Because working out a standard for the thing you want, then implementing it, is more more work than implementing the thing you want immediately.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.