with the amount of people AI drives to suicide, i think it will be banned eventually. its only a matter of time
>>107810326Why did he make ChatGPT sexy?
>>107810337>hechud...
>>107810326If copyright couldn’t stop it, or schools couldn’t stop it, or the government censorship couldn’t stop it then few crazies going insane from it won’t stop it, not to mention the crazies that didn’t kill themselves will if you make it illegal anyway because of the withdrawal
>>107810362There are no brakes on the technological “progress” train, uncle Ted talked about this.
>>107810326I thought we are supposed to make fun of suicides. Also, skill issue.
>>107810337Clicks.
>>107810326they will not ban computers crunching numbers because 3 people a year kill themselves
>>107810326>semblant of natural selectionplease dont
>>107810326>kill youself because a bunch of 1s and 0s told you to do itIt's one of the things that makes me support AI even more, it speeds up natural selection by weeding out the weak.
>>107810326That's what Elon is hoping for, he wants AI regulated to weed out the competition: In a regulated economy, only the big players survive.That's why he's allowing X to be flooded with quasi-csam > he's trying to force governments to regulate it. He's worse than the pedo's
>>107810672dont regulate and all you get is monopolieshave you tried not being a corrupt shithole?
>>107810672btw if thats what his factories would look like id immdiately buy a cybertruck
>>107810326Yeah like they banned social media.
>>107810689>dont regulate and all you get is monopoliesmore regulations = higher barrier to entryin a completely unregulated market, aside from restrictions on the use of force, it is easier for competitors to get startedif you have to follow a million pages of regulations, that imposes a major cost of entry into any existing market, making new competition near to impossible to establishnot saying "all regulation bad", but over regulation is what causes monopolies to exist
>>107811011>>107810689>>107810672hey retards. it's malicious people doing malicious stuff. when it comes to what they do it doesn't matter what your "preferred" whatever is they'll exploit it and subvert it so it works for themthe fact you sorta retards try and pretend regulation or deregulated somehow stops them only helps them>laws saying don't murder stops murderno>if everybody has a gun it stops murdernowhether it's regulation or deregulation you need to deal with the PEOPLE. they will erode anything and succeed since you two retards are arguing about regulation instead of dealing with the malicious element of people.
>>107811011Some companies may lobby to have regulations enacted that they can wield as a weapon, but companies growing to the size that permits this is only possible without enforced anti-monopoly laws. We’ve been deregulating since Nixon, and look where it’s landed us. An open market is an idealistic fantasy. If the government isn’t making rules, the big players in the market will, and they’ll enforce them too. As with everything, a balance is necessary. And one must be willing to kill companies that are causing social harm even if it might harm GDP. Our issues fundamentally lie in the fact that politicians nowadays only give a shit about GDP numbers, not about actual outcomes for their constituents.
