Fucking based.
>>107817265Did you just see something (or more likely post something) on Reddit you agreed with and then took a screenshot of it to repost on 4chan so you can get attention from strangers on the Internet? >r/anti workOkay troonI found the post in 10 seconds with help from AI btw.
>>107817265>>107817342I work integrating llms in workplaces as a freelancer, I can tell you firsthand people are being replaced and let go
>>107817265>parroting the "next word predictor" meme AGAIN
>>107817378it's true thougheverbeit
>>107817378literally true in reference to llms at least
>>107817356do wagies spit at you when you come to do your job?
>>107817265Just today, I created a header for a browser extension popup that is styled in line with the rest of the app in ~20 seconds. A couple minutes after manual adjustments. It would take around 30 mins for me to do that otherwise. That efficiency difference is lost jobs.
>>107817378what do you think an LLM is exactly you absolute mouthbreather?
>>107817342i'm with xxx_poonslayer69 on this one >>107817356>I work integrating llms in workplaces as a freelancer, no, you don't >I can tell you firsthand people are being replaced and let gono, you can't, not honestly put more effort into your LARP bait in the future
>heh, not to brag, but i'm very educated>AI just predicts the next word>AI is just a fancy autocorrect>AI is just if statements>AI uses water>AI is a bubblethe problem with LLMs is their lack of world modelsspecifically an LLM doesn't automatically know the stars are not visible from a windowless basementchain-of-thought reasoning exists as an improvised fix for a fundamental problembut these mouth breathing retards wouldn't know that>AI is useless, it will never turn a profit>AI is evil because it's replacing jobsi shan't tolerate normies any longer
>>107817431You've never done anything useful and productive in your entire life.
>>107817398It's also literally true that software is just 1s and 0s, or that humans are just genome replicators. Those reductionist descriptions don't let us answer important questions like what sort of work is software or humans or LLMs capable of performing.
go back
>>107817356SAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAR THE JOBS WILL BE REDEEMED SAAAAAAAAAR
>>107818671the assumption is that intelligence exists independent of language, which is why AGI is going to be the real breakthrough when it comes to non-language based operations and automation. current LLM's do not exist outside of words and predictions, real intelligence does.
>>107817378It's literally true. Even the "reasoning models" are just adding a deeper autoregression to their "next word prediction" scheme.
>>107818671I agree with them that AI is effectively useless for any serious person. I haven't seen a single legitimate use for an LLM system that wouldn't be better served by the alternatives. You may be making your AI spaghetti code quickly, but it's shit and will be near impossible to maintain (meaning the next time you need to change or add features, you're basically going to be scrapping the whole code base and starting over). Your self-education would literally be infinitely better if you just went to Wikipedia and took notes (or God forbid, read from a textbook), as the AI literally can't do anything but poorly summarize those topics anyways. The AI customer interaction will always be worse than an intentionally programmed decision tree based chatbot with human logical systems used in its design. AI/LLM based decision systems are inferior in every single way to classical signal detection and decision theory strategies, and completely outdone by classical reinforcement learning. There is absolutely no real world use case for these LLMs where the user is not better served by doing something else.
>>107823055Generating meeting transcripts and summaries it every manager's dream and AI is actually pretty good there.>inb4 just do it yourselfManager's workday is 90% meetings, you'd howl after a week.
>>107823055well a lot of jobs can be replaced because a lot of job are useless dekstop jobs.But yeah when it comes to real shit LLM are worthless. Maybe with cv and automated robots it will start to but will see.i'm most interested about the outcomes of robotics when it comes to those algorithms than the LLM thing (even if it's really good in it's own)so far robotics has evolved a lot since the beginning of this whole ai things.If i had to work on something it would be that and drones.Automated drones that you can control through voice would be amazing but here comes the networking problem and the battery capacity. It's getting betterand i guess there's a lot of research but for consumers ,drones sucks (lol 30mins) also legislation with drones sucks so much... i'm glad i live inthe countryside.type "engineer create machine gun gpt arrested" on youtube ,that's pretty wonderful what the guy did unfortunaly they did kick his ass.
>>107823067Brother, we already had non-LLM automated captioning and transcription. It achieved similar accuracy (around 90%) without anywhere near the same baggage and risk. The only novel thing the LLM is doing is summarizing the transcript (which is really not that useful when you remember that it's summaries are quite likely to place emphasis in completely arbitrary ways). >>107823117When you say robotics, what are you specifically talking about? Automated path planning? Automated mapping/SLAM? Image detection and tracking? All of these things are based on classical signal processing, and optimal control theory, not AI. The closest is RL, which is far closer to optimal control theory than it is LLMs/transformers.
If you dont own a buisness, you're an NPC and I dont see you as a human being. AI is good
