Have you completely replaced googling stuff with asking ChatGPT about it, or do you still do manual searches on google?
what's it to ya
Still use Brave Search.Still use Stack Overflow.AI slop is still not good enough to replace the latter and it's just too slow and inconvenient compared to the former.
paizuri touko
>>107818300not yet, but i think soon everyone will be doing just that. ai is the future and its here to stay.
Yes and no, yes it replaces using a search engine, because search engines are a horrible way of finding information, because you need to find something you don't know but do know exists. and requires very specific keyword, in my opinion and has been worst thing about technology until GPT came arround which means discovery can be done easier then ever before, This the technology I was looking for FOR YEARS!I still use search engines for finding things I know exist and know what they are.
>>107818300>>107818371if only google search had some kind of an AI of its own
>>107818300>Have you completely replaced googling stuff with asking ChatGPT about itWhy would anyone do this?
>>107818317>Still use Brave
>>107818539>if only google search had some kind of an AI of its ownThis is exactly something I was thinking about a search engine that is AI based not plastering AI ontop of search but it being the center, it being able to read between the lines Would be a godsend
>>107818564I still use brave as an alternative browser, when chromium is needed and for webapps otherwise there are not good alternatives, helium is promising but still not baked if helium has the option to delete data on exit that's when I switch.
>>107818300Most of the search engines seem to have summarizers too. I mostly still use search engines, but I do use LLMs for some things. I don't like giving companies more specific windows into how I ask questions or think about things.
>make your search shit>wait for ai>???>profit
Still do manual searches on GoogleHave devices set to only return web results (no AI overview)
>>107818300>I still search manually at least half the time. but one advantage of LLMs is that I can ask "can I cook potatoes with beans" and it'll say yes or no, in comparison to putting the same (or a slimmer version) in google and getting either nothing, a study unrelated to the question, or a big ass recipe with a hundred ingredients with two of them being potatoes and beans.still there's a slim chance that the LLM's "yes" is wrong and I'll die from food poisoning in the following days but whatever
>>107818300no I only use translated russian search engines.
>>107818300i still use google on my self hosted SearXNG instance
>>107818300i put every search through grok, chatgpt, perplexity and claude they're usually completely useless but i dont care because they cost a lot to run but im not paying
>>107818300Googling just straight up gives you slop from fake websites. At least ChatGPT gives you filtered and informed slop
>>107818300I've been venting to Chatgpt more and more. Problem is that it's programmed to agree with you but it's better than being ignored.
>>107818300I use both, llms and search engines.
>>107818300Google has started to suck so bad to the point of it being unusable even before AI chat bots took off. Yes, but I use Grok.
>>107818300No, I still don’t trust ChatGPT enough to actually replace google with it
>>107818300Manual searches are all I ever do but Gemini can usually give me the answer right away and then I check its sources.
>>107819878What makes google "unusable" to you?Just wondering, since I see this sentiment often, but I honestly cannot understand it even a little bit. I'm just perplexed.
>>107818300I use Perplexity mostly. Google has been garbage since they started fucking with the results to add more niggers and stuff.
Anyone keeping on getting the "Grok is under heavy usage right now" more often? I dont want to make an account
>>107819941It never finds what I'm looking for, just links to cnn.
>>107820112What are you looking for?
>>107818300I'm still using search engine>ChatGPTI can't trust it, biased result and hallucination risk.
>>107820114If you have to ask what someones looking for beyond cnn you're either a jeet, a bot, or straight up retarded.
>>107820380Look I just want to know what the fuck you're searching for that supposedly is only giving just cnn links on google. Maybe try not appending site:cnn.com to your searches? Or stop searching exact strings that only appear on CNN? Or stop searching writers names who write for CNN?I honestly don't even know what you're trying to say with that. There's a million and one things not on CNN. Are you trying to imply google is hiding some stormfront, breitbart shit from you?Man I really can't deal with you jackasses sometimes.
>>107820463the fact that you cant make the inference of cnn to be any paid source (reddit, gurdian, transmedia, etc) and then start spitting shit like, "maybe try not appending site:cnn" tells me that not only are you a rape victim but you're an AI addicted zoomer with no friends!
>>107820503and you still cant say what you're searching for, curiousim not entertaining this any longer
>>107820524nta but I'm looking for truth, and yet it only seems to find cnn links for me
It really depends. Web searches are ass for recipes and when you find the site, you have to read the life story of the cook for some reason.Chatgpt really shines in this because it skips most of the bullshit.But web searches are decent if you need to find multi solutions to something
>>107820118>I can't trust it, biased result and hallucination risk.Thankfully jewgle is on our side, right?
>>107820540>you have to read the life story of the cook for some reason.get better home security so there isn't someone at gunpoint forcing you to not use your mouse wheel to scroll anymore, best thing I ever did. Now I dont have to rely on a hallucination machine for something precise like a recipe that you really want at least one vote of confidence in, AND i don't have have to read bullshit on a blog
>>107820538ah i see your problem, if you're looking for truth this is where you need to go
>>107818300No and No. I have both containerized, running locally. I don't live the botnet life.>Extra CreditI host my own e-mail server, as well. Nothing is perfect, but I'm not going to be some techbros>product
>>107820624Facts and no one else's dogma. Just you and your maker. Simple as.
